API Management · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Speakeasy

Kong Gateway
API Management
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Speakeasy
Identity & Access Management
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong Gateway has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Speakeasy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Speakeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | web, api |
| Category | API Management | Identity & Access Management |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Speakeasy
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Speakeasy
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Speakeasy
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Kong Gateway
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Kong Gateway
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Kong Gateway
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Speakeasy?
- Kong Gateway has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong Gateway and On request for Speakeasy.
- Does Kong Gateway or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Yes. Kong Gateway has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Speakeasy cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Hasura
- Kong Gateway vs PocketBase
- Kong Gateway vs Sanity
- Kong Gateway vs Apigee
- Kong Gateway vs Ably
- Kong Gateway vs Pusher
- Kong Gateway vs PubNub
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Apollo GraphQL
- Kong Gateway vs Bruno
- Kong Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Parse Server
- Kong Gateway vs Stainless
- Kong Gateway vs Stoplight
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong Gateway vs Frontegg
- Kong Gateway vs Logto
- Kong Gateway vs Ory
- Kong Gateway vs Clerk
- Speakeasy vs Appwrite
- Speakeasy vs Hasura
- Speakeasy vs PocketBase
- Speakeasy vs Sanity
- Speakeasy vs Apigee
- Speakeasy vs Ably
- Speakeasy vs Pusher
- Speakeasy vs PubNub
- Speakeasy vs Treblle
- Speakeasy vs Apollo GraphQL
- Speakeasy vs Bruno
- Speakeasy vs KeystoneJS
- Speakeasy vs Moesif
- Speakeasy vs Parse Server
- Speakeasy vs Stainless
- Speakeasy vs Stoplight
- Speakeasy vs Strapi
- Speakeasy vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Logto
- Speakeasy vs Ory
- Speakeasy vs Clerk
