Software · head to head
GraphHopper vs INTTRA

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
- They diverge on capability: GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, INTTRA covers Electronic booking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and INTTRA actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | INTTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $0.5/per-transaction |
| Pricing model | freemium | transaction |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in INTTRA
- Electronic booking
- Container tracking
- Documentation
- Rate management
- TMS platforms
- ERP systems
- Carrier systems
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot INTTRA
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot INTTRA
INTTRA
No use cases recorded yet. See the INTTRA review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
INTTRA
- INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
INTTRA
$0.5/per-transaction- Enterprise$1000/month
- E-booking
- Tracking
- Documentation
Which should you pick?
Choose INTTRA if
- You need electronic booking.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want container tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or INTTRA better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and INTTRA at $0.5/per-transaction, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or INTTRA?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and INTTRA at $0.5/per-transaction.
- Does GraphHopper or INTTRA run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. INTTRA runs on Web, Api.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what INTTRA is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphHopper do that INTTRA cannot?
- GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface. INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- GraphHopper vs MarineTraffic
- GraphHopper vs ChartCo
- GraphHopper vs Kongsberg Maritime
- GraphHopper vs Sea Machines
- GraphHopper vs Veson Nautical
- GraphHopper vs Wartsila Voyage
- GraphHopper vs Windward
- GraphHopper vs Dataloy
- GraphHopper vs DNV Maritime
- GraphHopper vs exactEarth
- GraphHopper vs FourKites
- GraphHopper vs Freightos
- GraphHopper vs Kpler
- GraphHopper vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- GraphHopper vs NAPA
- GraphHopper vs Nautilus Labs
- GraphHopper vs Navis N4
- GraphHopper vs NAVTOR
- INTTRA vs Mapbox
- INTTRA vs Google Maps Platform
- INTTRA vs HERE Technologies
- INTTRA vs Apple Maps
- INTTRA vs Leaflet
- INTTRA vs Esri ArcGIS
- INTTRA vs CesiumJS
- INTTRA vs Samsara
- INTTRA vs Bing Maps
- INTTRA vs CARTO
- INTTRA vs Geotab
- INTTRA vs HERE WeGo
- INTTRA vs IndoorAtlas
- INTTRA vs Mappedin
- INTTRA vs Verizon Connect
- INTTRA vs AllTrails
- INTTRA vs Citymapper
- INTTRA vs deck.gl
- INTTRA vs MarineTraffic
- INTTRA vs ChartCo
- INTTRA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- INTTRA vs Sea Machines
- INTTRA vs Veson Nautical
- INTTRA vs Wartsila Voyage
- INTTRA vs Windward
- INTTRA vs Dataloy
- INTTRA vs DNV Maritime
- INTTRA vs exactEarth
- INTTRA vs FourKites
- INTTRA vs Freightos
- INTTRA vs Kpler
- INTTRA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- INTTRA vs NAPA
- INTTRA vs Nautilus Labs
- INTTRA vs Navis N4
- INTTRA vs NAVTOR

