Maps & Navigation · head to head
GraphHopper vs NAPA

GraphHopper
Maps & Navigation
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; NAPA the Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
- They diverge on capability: GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, NAPA covers Ship design.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and NAPA actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | NAPA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $5000/year |
| Pricing model | freemium | one-time |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, Web |
| Category | Maps & Navigation | Maritime & Shipping |
| Founded | Unknown | 1989 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in NAPA
- Ship design
- Stability calculation
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- CAD systems
- Fleet management
- Weather routing
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot NAPA
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot NAPA
NAPA
No use cases recorded yet. See the NAPA review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
NAPA
- The Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
NAPA
$5000/year- Fleet Intelligence$15000/year
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose NAPA if
- You need ship design.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want stability calculation.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or NAPA better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and NAPA at $5000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or NAPA?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and NAPA at $5000/year.
- Does GraphHopper or NAPA run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. NAPA runs on Windows, Web.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what NAPA is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphHopper do that NAPA cannot?
- GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface. NAPA covers Ship design, Stability calculation, Voyage optimization, Performance monitoring.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- GraphHopper vs MarineTraffic
- GraphHopper vs ChartCo
- GraphHopper vs Kongsberg Maritime
- GraphHopper vs Sea Machines
- GraphHopper vs Veson Nautical
- GraphHopper vs Wartsila Voyage
- GraphHopper vs Windward
- GraphHopper vs Dataloy
- GraphHopper vs DNV Maritime
- GraphHopper vs exactEarth
- GraphHopper vs FourKites
- GraphHopper vs Freightos
- GraphHopper vs INTTRA
- GraphHopper vs Kpler
- GraphHopper vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- GraphHopper vs Nautilus Labs
- GraphHopper vs Navis N4
- GraphHopper vs NAVTOR
- NAPA vs Mapbox
- NAPA vs Google Maps Platform
- NAPA vs HERE Technologies
- NAPA vs Apple Maps
- NAPA vs Leaflet
- NAPA vs Esri ArcGIS
- NAPA vs CesiumJS
- NAPA vs Samsara
- NAPA vs Bing Maps
- NAPA vs CARTO
- NAPA vs Geotab
- NAPA vs HERE WeGo
- NAPA vs IndoorAtlas
- NAPA vs Mappedin
- NAPA vs Verizon Connect
- NAPA vs AllTrails
- NAPA vs Citymapper
- NAPA vs deck.gl
- NAPA vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA vs ChartCo
- NAPA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA vs Sea Machines
- NAPA vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA vs Wartsila Voyage
- NAPA vs Windward
- NAPA vs Dataloy
- NAPA vs DNV Maritime
- NAPA vs exactEarth
- NAPA vs FourKites
- NAPA vs Freightos
- NAPA vs INTTRA
- NAPA vs Kpler
- NAPA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- NAPA vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA vs Navis N4
- NAPA vs NAVTOR

