Maps & Navigation · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs INTTRA

IndoorAtlas
Maps & Navigation
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

INTTRA
Maritime & Shipping
Ocean shipping network platform
- From
- $0.5/per-transaction
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; INTTRA iNTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, INTTRA covers Electronic booking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and INTTRA actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | INTTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $0.5/per-transaction |
| Pricing model | Unknown | transaction |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, Api |
| Category | Maps & Navigation | Maritime & Shipping |
| Founded | 2012 | 2000 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in INTTRA
- Electronic booking
- Container tracking
- Documentation
- Rate management
- TMS platforms
- ERP systems
- Carrier systems
- Web support
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
INTTRA
- INTTRA's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive on 18 January 2022 confirms it operates under E2open with a 'Learn About E2open' link on its own navigation, and pricing remains bare contact-sales with no named editions; a customer testimonial quoted on the same page (not INTTRA's own pricing) cites Bill of Lading fee savings of $25 to $75 per shipment from consolidating onto the platform
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- Development$400/month
- Free tier available
- Production$349/month
- Per-venue subscription
- Multi-layer sensor fusion
INTTRA
$0.5/per-transaction- Enterprise$1000/month
- E-booking
- Tracking
- Documentation
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose INTTRA if
- You need electronic booking.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want container tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or INTTRA better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and INTTRA at $0.5/per-transaction, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or INTTRA?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and $0.5/per-transaction for INTTRA.
- Does IndoorAtlas or INTTRA run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. INTTRA runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. INTTRA starts at $0.5/per-transaction.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that INTTRA cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. INTTRA covers Electronic booking, Container tracking, Documentation, Rate management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE Technologies
- IndoorAtlas vs Apple Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Leaflet
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Samsara
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs CARTO
- IndoorAtlas vs Geotab
- IndoorAtlas vs GraphHopper
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE WeGo
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Verizon Connect
- IndoorAtlas vs AllTrails
- IndoorAtlas vs Citymapper
- IndoorAtlas vs deck.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs MarineTraffic
- IndoorAtlas vs ChartCo
- IndoorAtlas vs Kongsberg Maritime
- IndoorAtlas vs Sea Machines
- IndoorAtlas vs Veson Nautical
- IndoorAtlas vs Wartsila Voyage
- IndoorAtlas vs Windward
- IndoorAtlas vs Dataloy
- IndoorAtlas vs DNV Maritime
- IndoorAtlas vs exactEarth
- IndoorAtlas vs FourKites
- IndoorAtlas vs Freightos
- IndoorAtlas vs Kpler
- IndoorAtlas vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- IndoorAtlas vs NAPA
- IndoorAtlas vs Nautilus Labs
- IndoorAtlas vs Navis N4
- IndoorAtlas vs NAVTOR
- INTTRA vs Mapbox
- INTTRA vs Google Maps Platform
- INTTRA vs HERE Technologies
- INTTRA vs Apple Maps
- INTTRA vs Leaflet
- INTTRA vs Esri ArcGIS
- INTTRA vs CesiumJS
- INTTRA vs Samsara
- INTTRA vs Bing Maps
- INTTRA vs CARTO
- INTTRA vs Geotab
- INTTRA vs GraphHopper
- INTTRA vs HERE WeGo
- INTTRA vs Mappedin
- INTTRA vs Verizon Connect
- INTTRA vs AllTrails
- INTTRA vs Citymapper
- INTTRA vs deck.gl
- INTTRA vs MarineTraffic
- INTTRA vs ChartCo
- INTTRA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- INTTRA vs Sea Machines
- INTTRA vs Veson Nautical
- INTTRA vs Wartsila Voyage
- INTTRA vs Windward
- INTTRA vs Dataloy
- INTTRA vs DNV Maritime
- INTTRA vs exactEarth
- INTTRA vs FourKites
- INTTRA vs Freightos
- INTTRA vs Kpler
- INTTRA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- INTTRA vs NAPA
- INTTRA vs Nautilus Labs
- INTTRA vs Navis N4
- INTTRA vs NAVTOR
