Softwr

Software · head to head

Fond vs Terryberry

Fond logo

Fond

Software

Employee experience platform for modern teams

From
On request
Rated
-
Terryberry logo

Terryberry

Software

Employee recognition and service awards since 1918

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fond acquired by Reward Gateway and now sold as part of their employee engagement suite rather than independently; Terryberry pricing not transparent, requires contacting sales for custom quotes instead of self-serve pricing pages
  • They diverge on capability: Fond covers Engagement tools, Terryberry covers Service anniversary awards.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fond and Terryberry actually diverge.

Attributes where Fond and Terryberry differ
AttributeFondTerryberry
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
Founded20131918

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fond

  • Engagement tools
  • Culture programs
  • Analytics dashboard
  • Manager resources
  • Customizable workflows
  • Reporting
  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams

Only in Terryberry

  • Service anniversary awards
  • Custom awards
  • Wellness programs
  • Safety recognition
  • Analytics
  • Gift cards
  • ADP
  • UltiPro

Both cover

  • Social recognition
  • Mobile app
  • Workday

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fond

  • Peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each othernot Terryberry
  • Redeeming points against a rewards cataloguenot Terryberry
  • Corporate perks and discounts for staffnot Terryberry
  • Running a recognition programme across international officesnot Terryberry

Terryberry

  • Service awardsnot Fond
  • Employee recognitionnot Fond
  • Safety programsnot Fond
  • Wellness initiativesnot Fond

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fond

  • Acquired by Reward Gateway and now sold as part of their employee engagement suite rather than independently

Terryberry

  • Pricing not transparent, requires contacting sales for custom quotes instead of self-serve pricing pages
  • Not optimized for small companies with fewer than 20 employees due to limited participant pool
  • No open API available for custom integrations
  • No free trial offered to evaluate the platform before purchase
  • Limited to recognition and engagement features, lacks performance management capabilities like reviews or goal tracking

Pricing, plan by plan

Fond

On request
  • Fond Platform$undefined/month
    • Recognition
    • Engagement tools
    • Culture building

Terryberry

On request
  • Recognition Platform$undefined/month
    • Social recognition
    • Service awards
    • Wellness

Which should you pick?

Choose Fond if

  • You need engagement tools.
  • You also want culture programs.

Choose Terryberry if

  • You need service anniversary awards.
  • You also want custom awards.

Questions people ask

Is Fond or Terryberry better?
Neither clearly leads. Fond starts at On request and Terryberry at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fond or Terryberry?
Fond starts at On request and Terryberry at On request.
Does Fond or Terryberry run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Fond best used for?
Fond is most often used for peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each other, redeeming points against a rewards catalogue, corporate perks and discounts for staff, running a recognition programme across international offices. Of those, peer-to-peer recognition with points employees send each other and redeeming points against a rewards catalogue are not what Terryberry is typically brought in for.
What can Fond do that Terryberry cannot?
Fond covers Engagement tools, Culture programs, Analytics dashboard, Manager resources. Terryberry covers Service anniversary awards, Custom awards, Wellness programs, Safety recognition. Both handle Social recognition, Mobile app, Workday.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Terryberry: What is Terryberry and what does the engagement platform include?

Terryberry is an employee engagement platform founded in 1918 that serves over 44,000 organizations. It includes Be Recognized (peer-to-peer recognition), Be Rewarded (points and rewards redemption), Be Well (wellness programs), Be Heard (employee surveys), and Symbolic Awards (custom physical awards). All modules integrate into a unified dashboard.

Source
Terryberry: What is the pricing for Terryberry's platform?

Terryberry does not publish transparent pricing on its website. The platform starts at approximately $12 per employee per month for software, and wellness programs start at $3.75 per participant per month. All pricing is custom and requires contacting the sales team for a quote based on organization size and selected features.

Source
Terryberry: What HRIS and communication tools does Terryberry integrate with?

Terryberry integrates with over 50 HRIS systems including Workday and ADP. It also integrates with Microsoft Teams and Slack for recognition notifications and is compatible with Amazon Business for rewards. The integrations allow seamless HRIS data syncing without manual data entry.

Source
Terryberry: What customization options are available for service awards?

Terryberry offers custom awards in materials including jewelry, plaques, trophies, crystal, glass, acrylic, wood, marble, and steel. Awards can be personalized with names, roles, and year of service indicators. Most custom orders are delivered within 3-5 weeks.

Source
Terryberry: Does Terryberry offer performance management beyond recognition?

Terryberry focuses primarily on employee recognition and engagement. The platform does not include broader performance management capabilities like performance reviews or goal tracking. Organizations needing comprehensive performance management would need a separate solution.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads