Softwr

Game Development · head to head

DragonBones vs Houdini

D

DragonBones

Game Development

Free 2D skeletal animation solution

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Houdini logo

Houdini

3D & CAD

Procedural 3D animation and VFX

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: DragonBones javaScript/TypeScript runtime limited to specific game engines (Egret, PixiJS, Phaser, Hilo, Cocos Creator); Houdini houdini Indie at $299 per year requires annual gross revenue under $100K USD
  • They diverge on capability: DragonBones covers Skeletal animation, Houdini covers Procedural modeling.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which DragonBones and Houdini actually diverge.

Attributes where DragonBones and Houdini differ
AttributeDragonBonesHoudini
Pricing modelopen-sourcesubscription
PlatformsEgret, PixiJS, Phaser, Hilo, Cocos CreatorWindows, MacOS, Linux
CategoryGame Development3D & CAD
Founded20141987

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in DragonBones

  • Skeletal animation
  • Mesh deformation
  • IK system
  • Texture atlas
  • Animation blending
  • Bone constraints
  • FFD
  • Multi-resolution

Only in Houdini

  • Procedural modeling
  • VFX
  • Simulations
  • Particle systems
  • Pyro FX
  • Ocean tools
  • Rigging
  • Rendering

Both cover

  • Unity
  • Windows support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

DragonBones

  • 2D skeletal animation for JavaScript and TypeScript game enginesnot Houdini
  • Cross-engine animation library for indie game developmentnot Houdini
  • Animation creation with LoongBones editornot Houdini

Houdini

  • Procedural 3D modelling and environment generationnot DragonBones
  • Visual effects simulation for pyro, fluids, cloth and rigid bodiesnot DragonBones
  • Building reusable procedural assets for a studio pipelinenot DragonBones

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

DragonBones

  • JavaScript/TypeScript runtime limited to specific game engines (Egret, PixiJS, Phaser, Hilo, Cocos Creator)

Houdini

  • Houdini Indie at $299 per year requires annual gross revenue under $100K USD
  • Houdini Indie cannot be used in the same pipeline as commercial versions of Houdini
  • Houdini Indie and Apprentice save to their own .hipnc file format, which commercial Houdini pipelines do not share
  • The free Apprentice edition is non commercial, caps render resolution at 1920x1080 and watermarks output images
  • Houdini Indie ships with only 2 render tokens
  • Full DOP level simulation node access requires Houdini FX at $4,495 per workstation; Core at $1,995 exposes only SOP level pre built simulation assets
  • Extra render tokens cost $195

Pricing, plan by plan

DragonBones

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the DragonBones review.

Houdini

Free
  • ApprenticeFree
    • Learning version
    • Non-commercial
  • Indie$269/month
    • Revenue limit $100K
  • Core$1995/month
    • Full commercial
  • FX$4495/month
    • Full + simulations

Which should you pick?

Choose DragonBones if

  • You need skeletal animation.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Egret, PixiJS, Phaser, Hilo, Cocos Creator.
  • You also want mesh deformation.
DragonBones review

Choose Houdini if

  • You need procedural modeling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
  • You also want vfx.
Houdini review

Questions people ask

Is DragonBones or Houdini better?
Neither clearly leads. DragonBones starts at Free and Houdini at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, DragonBones or Houdini?
DragonBones starts at Free and Houdini at Free.
Does DragonBones or Houdini run on more platforms?
DragonBones runs on Egret, PixiJS, Phaser, Hilo, Cocos Creator. Houdini runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
Can I use DragonBones for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is DragonBones best used for?
DragonBones is most often used for 2d skeletal animation for javascript and typescript game engines, cross-engine animation library for indie game development, animation creation with loongbones editor. Of those, 2d skeletal animation for javascript and typescript game engines and cross-engine animation library for indie game development are not what Houdini is typically brought in for.
What can DragonBones do that Houdini cannot?
DragonBones covers Skeletal animation, Mesh deformation, IK system, Texture atlas. Houdini covers Procedural modeling, VFX, Simulations, Particle systems. Both handle Unity, Windows support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on DragonBones

More on Houdini

Keep looking

Other head to heads