Software · head to head
3D-Coat vs ARKit
The short version
- Only ARKit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: 3D-Coat split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence; ARKit iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems
- They diverge on capability: 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, ARKit covers World tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3D-Coat and ARKit actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting
- Surface sculpting
- Retopology
- UV mapping
- Texture painting
- PBR materials
- Smart materials
- Baking
Only in ARKit
- World tracking
- Face tracking
- Body tracking
- LiDAR support
- RealityKit
- Reality Composer
- SceneKit
- Ar support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting from a digital clay blocknot ARKit
- Retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshesnot ARKit
- UV mapping and PBR texturingnot ARKit
- Preparing print-ready models for 3D printingnot ARKit
- Node-based material authoring on the GPUnot ARKit
ARKit
- VR Gamingnot 3D-Coat
- AR Marketingnot 3D-Coat
- Virtual Trainingnot 3D-Coat
- 3D Visualizationnot 3D-Coat
- Immersive Experiencesnot 3D-Coat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3D-Coat
- Split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence
- Pricing is not published on the product pages
- Licences are sold node-locked or floating, so moving a seat between machines depends on which was bought
ARKit
- iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems
- Location-based AR accuracy limited to 3-5 meters, insufficient for precise applications
- Cannot handle very fast motion capture
- Accuracy varies with lighting conditions and surface characteristics
- Requires iOS 11 or later and specific device hardware
Pricing, plan by plan
3D-Coat
$29/month- Amateur$99/month
- Non-commercial use
- Professional$379/month
- Full commercial license
- Floating$568/month
- Network licensing
ARKit
Free- FreeFree
- Full SDK
- Documentation
- Sample code
Which should you pick?
Choose 3D-Coat if
- You need voxel sculpting.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want surface sculpting.
Choose ARKit if
- You need world tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS.
- You also want face tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is 3D-Coat or ARKit better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and ARKit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3D-Coat or ARKit?
- ARKit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for 3D-Coat and Free for ARKit.
- Does 3D-Coat or ARKit run on more platforms?
- 3D-Coat runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. ARKit runs on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS.
- Can I use ARKit for free?
- Yes. ARKit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month.
- What is 3D-Coat best used for?
- 3D-Coat is most often used for voxel sculpting from a digital clay block, retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes, uv mapping and pbr texturing, preparing print-ready models for 3d printing. Of those, voxel sculpting from a digital clay block and retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes are not what ARKit is typically brought in for.
- What can 3D-Coat do that ARKit cannot?
- 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Surface sculpting, Retopology, UV mapping. ARKit covers World tracking, Face tracking, Body tracking, LiDAR support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ARKit: Is ARKit free to use?
Yes, ARKit is free to use. It is included in Apple's iOS SDK and requires only Xcode and a Mac to start building AR apps. There are no licensing fees or subscription costs.
SourceARKit: What iOS devices support ARKit?
ARKit is supported on iPhone 6s and later, iPad Pro models, and the latest iPad models. It requires iOS 11 or later. Apple Vision Pro also supports ARKit with enhanced capabilities through visionOS.
SourceARKit: Can ARKit work offline?
ARKit can function offline for tracking and scene understanding since these operations run locally on the device. However, multiplayer AR features and cloud-based object detection require internet connectivity.
SourceARKit: Does ARKit integrate with game engines?
Yes, ARKit integrates with Unity through the Unity ARKit Plugin and with Unreal Engine. Developers can also use it with Metal, SceneKit, and Apple's RealityKit framework.
SourceARKit: What are ARKit's limitations with location-based AR?
ARKit's location-based positioning has accuracy limitations. Image-based positioning is primarily useful in urban areas, and beacon-based navigation provides accuracy of 3-5 meters, which is insufficient for precise AR applications requiring 1-meter accuracy or better.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3D-Coat vs Enscape
- 3D-Coat vs V-Ray
- 3D-Coat vs FreeCAD
- 3D-Coat vs KeyShot
- 3D-Coat vs Lumion
- 3D-Coat vs Houdini
- 3D-Coat vs Arnold
- 3D-Coat vs Inventor
- 3D-Coat vs Mudbox
- 3D-Coat vs Corona Renderer
- 3D-Coat vs D5 Render
- 3D-Coat vs Twinmotion
- 3D-Coat vs LightWave 3D
- 3D-Coat vs OpenSCAD
- 3D-Coat vs PrusaSlicer
- 3D-Coat vs Siemens NX
- 3D-Coat vs ZBrush
- 3D-Coat vs Alibre Design
- 3D-Coat vs ARCore
- 3D-Coat vs Meta Quest
- 3D-Coat vs Apple Vision Pro
- 3D-Coat vs Unity AR Foundation
- 3D-Coat vs HTC Vive
- 3D-Coat vs 8th Wall
- 3D-Coat vs Lens Studio
- 3D-Coat vs Vuforia
- 3D-Coat vs A-Frame
- 3D-Coat vs Babylon.js
- 3D-Coat vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- 3D-Coat vs Niantic Lightship
- 3D-Coat vs PlayStation VR2
- 3D-Coat vs Spark AR Studio
- 3D-Coat vs TikTok Effect House
- 3D-Coat vs Gravity Sketch
- 3D-Coat vs Instagram AR Effects
- 3D-Coat vs Magic Leap 2
- ARKit vs Enscape
- ARKit vs V-Ray
- ARKit vs FreeCAD
- ARKit vs KeyShot
- ARKit vs Lumion
- ARKit vs Houdini
- ARKit vs Arnold
- ARKit vs Inventor
- ARKit vs Mudbox
- ARKit vs Corona Renderer
- ARKit vs D5 Render
- ARKit vs Twinmotion
- ARKit vs LightWave 3D
- ARKit vs OpenSCAD
- ARKit vs PrusaSlicer
- ARKit vs Siemens NX
- ARKit vs ZBrush
- ARKit vs Alibre Design
- ARKit vs ARCore
- ARKit vs Meta Quest
- ARKit vs Apple Vision Pro
- ARKit vs Unity AR Foundation
- ARKit vs HTC Vive
- ARKit vs 8th Wall
- ARKit vs Lens Studio
- ARKit vs Vuforia
- ARKit vs A-Frame
- ARKit vs Babylon.js
- ARKit vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- ARKit vs Niantic Lightship
- ARKit vs PlayStation VR2
- ARKit vs Spark AR Studio
- ARKit vs TikTok Effect House
- ARKit vs Gravity Sketch
- ARKit vs Instagram AR Effects
- ARKit vs Magic Leap 2


