3D & CAD · head to head
3D-Coat vs A-Frame
The short version
- Only A-Frame has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: 3D-Coat split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence; A-Frame requires WebXR-capable browser; not supported on older browsers or devices without WebXR implementation
- They diverge on capability: 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, A-Frame covers Declarative HTML.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3D-Coat and A-Frame actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting
- Surface sculpting
- Retopology
- UV mapping
- Texture painting
- PBR materials
- Smart materials
- Baking
Only in A-Frame
- Declarative HTML
- Entity-component system
- WebXR support
- Cross-platform
- Three.js
- AR.js
- Physics engines
- Networking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting from a digital clay blocknot A-Frame
- Retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshesnot A-Frame
- UV mapping and PBR texturingnot A-Frame
- Preparing print-ready models for 3D printingnot A-Frame
- Node-based material authoring on the GPUnot A-Frame
A-Frame
- Virtual reality web experiencesnot 3D-Coat
- Augmented reality applicationsnot 3D-Coat
- 3D web visualisationsnot 3D-Coat
- Interactive 3D content for web browsersnot 3D-Coat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3D-Coat
- Split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence
- Pricing is not published on the product pages
- Licences are sold node-locked or floating, so moving a seat between machines depends on which was bought
A-Frame
- Requires WebXR-capable browser; not supported on older browsers or devices without WebXR implementation
Pricing, plan by plan
3D-Coat
$29/month- Amateur$99/month
- Non-commercial use
- Professional$379/month
- Full commercial license
- Floating$568/month
- Network licensing
A-Frame
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the A-Frame review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3D-Coat if
- You need voxel sculpting.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want surface sculpting.
Choose A-Frame if
- You need declarative html.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web (via WebXR), VR headsets, AR-capable mobile devices.
- You also want entity-component system.
Questions people ask
- Is 3D-Coat or A-Frame better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and A-Frame at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3D-Coat or A-Frame?
- A-Frame has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for 3D-Coat and Free for A-Frame.
- Does 3D-Coat or A-Frame run on more platforms?
- 3D-Coat runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. A-Frame runs on Web (via WebXR), VR headsets, AR-capable mobile devices.
- Can I use A-Frame for free?
- Yes. A-Frame has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month.
- What is 3D-Coat best used for?
- 3D-Coat is most often used for voxel sculpting from a digital clay block, retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes, uv mapping and pbr texturing, preparing print-ready models for 3d printing. Of those, voxel sculpting from a digital clay block and retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes are not what A-Frame is typically brought in for.
- What can 3D-Coat do that A-Frame cannot?
- 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Surface sculpting, Retopology, UV mapping. A-Frame covers Declarative HTML, Entity-component system, WebXR support, Cross-platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- 3D-Coat vs Enscape
- 3D-Coat vs V-Ray
- 3D-Coat vs FreeCAD
- 3D-Coat vs KeyShot
- 3D-Coat vs Lumion
- 3D-Coat vs Houdini
- 3D-Coat vs Arnold
- 3D-Coat vs Inventor
- 3D-Coat vs Mudbox
- 3D-Coat vs Corona Renderer
- 3D-Coat vs D5 Render
- 3D-Coat vs Twinmotion
- 3D-Coat vs LightWave 3D
- 3D-Coat vs OpenSCAD
- 3D-Coat vs PrusaSlicer
- 3D-Coat vs Siemens NX
- 3D-Coat vs ZBrush
- 3D-Coat vs Alibre Design
- 3D-Coat vs ARCore
- 3D-Coat vs ARKit
- 3D-Coat vs Meta Quest
- 3D-Coat vs Apple Vision Pro
- 3D-Coat vs Unity AR Foundation
- 3D-Coat vs HTC Vive
- 3D-Coat vs 8th Wall
- 3D-Coat vs Lens Studio
- 3D-Coat vs Vuforia
- 3D-Coat vs Babylon.js
- 3D-Coat vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- 3D-Coat vs Niantic Lightship
- 3D-Coat vs PlayStation VR2
- 3D-Coat vs Spark AR Studio
- 3D-Coat vs TikTok Effect House
- 3D-Coat vs Gravity Sketch
- 3D-Coat vs Instagram AR Effects
- 3D-Coat vs Magic Leap 2
- A-Frame vs Enscape
- A-Frame vs V-Ray
- A-Frame vs FreeCAD
- A-Frame vs KeyShot
- A-Frame vs Lumion
- A-Frame vs Houdini
- A-Frame vs Arnold
- A-Frame vs Inventor
- A-Frame vs Mudbox
- A-Frame vs Corona Renderer
- A-Frame vs D5 Render
- A-Frame vs Twinmotion
- A-Frame vs LightWave 3D
- A-Frame vs OpenSCAD
- A-Frame vs PrusaSlicer
- A-Frame vs Siemens NX
- A-Frame vs ZBrush
- A-Frame vs Alibre Design
- A-Frame vs ARCore
- A-Frame vs ARKit
- A-Frame vs Meta Quest
- A-Frame vs Apple Vision Pro
- A-Frame vs Unity AR Foundation
- A-Frame vs HTC Vive
- A-Frame vs 8th Wall
- A-Frame vs Lens Studio
- A-Frame vs Vuforia
- A-Frame vs Babylon.js
- A-Frame vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- A-Frame vs Niantic Lightship
- A-Frame vs PlayStation VR2
- A-Frame vs Spark AR Studio
- A-Frame vs TikTok Effect House
- A-Frame vs Gravity Sketch
- A-Frame vs Instagram AR Effects
- A-Frame vs Magic Leap 2


