Development Tools · head to head
GNU Emacs vs ESLint
GNU Emacs
Development Tools
Extensible, customizable free text editor and computing environment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GNU Emacs steep learning curve for its default keybindings and Lisp-based configuration.; ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GNU Emacs and ESLint actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Development Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GNU Emacs
- Emacs Lisp Extensibility
- Package Ecosystem
- Org Mode
- Built-in Version Control Interfaces
- Cross-platform
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that GNU Emacs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GNU Emacs
- Programming with deep Lisp-based customizationnot ESLint
- Note-taking and planning with Org modenot ESLint
- Managing email and file systems from a single environmentnot ESLint
- Long-term, keyboard-driven text editing workflowsnot ESLint
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot GNU Emacs
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot GNU Emacs
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot GNU Emacs
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot GNU Emacs
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot GNU Emacs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GNU Emacs
- Steep learning curve for its default keybindings and Lisp-based configuration.
- Default UI looks dated compared to modern editors without heavy customization.
- Performance can lag on very large files compared to newer editors.
- Discoverability of features is poor without prior familiarity or external guides.
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Pricing, plan by plan
GNU Emacs
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor and ecosystem, no paid tiers
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GNU Emacs if
- You need emacs lisp extensibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want package ecosystem.
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Questions people ask
- Is GNU Emacs or ESLint better?
- Neither clearly leads. GNU Emacs starts at Free and ESLint at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GNU Emacs or ESLint?
- GNU Emacs starts at Free and ESLint at Free.
- Does GNU Emacs or ESLint run on more platforms?
- GNU Emacs runs on linux, mac, windows. ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
- Can I use GNU Emacs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GNU Emacs best used for?
- GNU Emacs is most often used for programming with deep lisp-based customization, note-taking and planning with org mode, managing email and file systems from a single environment, long-term, keyboard-driven text editing workflows. Of those, programming with deep lisp-based customization and note-taking and planning with org mode are not what ESLint is typically brought in for.
- What can GNU Emacs do that ESLint cannot?
- GNU Emacs covers Emacs Lisp Extensibility, Package Ecosystem, Org Mode, Built-in Version Control Interfaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GNU Emacs: Is GNU Emacs free, including for commercial use?
Yes, Emacs is free software released under the GNU General Public License, which allows anyone to use, study, modify, and redistribute it, including commercially.
SourceESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourceGNU Emacs: How do I install Emacs?
On Linux it is available via package managers like apt-get, pacman, dnf, or zypper; on macOS via Homebrew or MacPorts; on Windows via an installer or zip from GNU mirrors; and on Android via F-Droid or GNU FTP.
SourceESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourceGNU Emacs: What platforms does Emacs support?
Emacs runs on GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Haiku, macOS, MS Windows, Android (versions 2.2 to 15.0), Solaris, and MS-DOS/FreeDOS.
SourceESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourceGNU Emacs: How is Emacs extended with packages?
Emacs is customized and extended through its Emacs Lisp dialect, with thousands of community packages distributed via repositories like MELPA that add language modes and tools.
SourceGNU Emacs: Where can I get source code or development builds?
Emacs source code and development builds are hosted at savannah.gnu.org, in addition to stable releases distributed through GNU mirrors.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- GNU Emacs vs pnpm
- GNU Emacs vs Turborepo
- GNU Emacs vs GitHub Copilot
- GNU Emacs vs Eclipse IDE
- GNU Emacs vs Yarn
- GNU Emacs vs CodeSandbox
- GNU Emacs vs Daytona
- GNU Emacs vs Ansible
- GNU Emacs vs Prettier
- GNU Emacs vs StackBlitz
- GNU Emacs vs Vite
- GNU Emacs vs Webpack
- GNU Emacs vs Argo CD
- GNU Emacs vs Azure DevOps
- GNU Emacs vs Bitbucket
- GNU Emacs vs Buildkite
- GNU Emacs vs Claude Code
- GNU Emacs vs Coder
- ESLint vs pnpm
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs GitHub Copilot
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Yarn
- ESLint vs CodeSandbox
- ESLint vs Daytona
- ESLint vs Ansible
- ESLint vs Prettier
- ESLint vs StackBlitz
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Webpack
- ESLint vs Argo CD
- ESLint vs Azure DevOps
- ESLint vs Bitbucket
- ESLint vs Buildkite
- ESLint vs Claude Code
- ESLint vs Coder