Bitbucket vs Sourcegraph Cody

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pricing, plan by plan

Which should you pick?

Questions people ask

Is Bitbucket or Sourcegraph Cody better?

Neither clearly leads. Bitbucket starts at Free and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Bitbucket or Sourcegraph Cody?

Bitbucket has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bitbucket and $59/month for Sourcegraph Cody.

Does Bitbucket or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?

Bitbucket runs on Web, Data Center. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.

Can I use Bitbucket for free?

Yes. Bitbucket has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month.

What is Bitbucket best used for?

Bitbucket is most often used for hosting git repositories for a software team, running ci and deployments with bitbucket pipelines, code review with branch permissions and access controls, linking commits to jira issues and updating their status automatically. Of those, hosting git repositories for a software team and running ci and deployments with bitbucket pipelines are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.

What can Bitbucket do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?

Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.