Scheduling & Booking · head to head
Acuity Scheduling vs Quo
The short version
- Only Quo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acuity Scheduling starter tier limited to 1 calendar only; Quo unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acuity Scheduling and Quo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acuity Scheduling | Quo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Scheduling & Booking | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acuity Scheduling
- Online booking
- Appointment types
- Calendar sync
- Payment processing
- Email reminders
- Client self-scheduling
- Packages & memberships
- Timezone detection
Only in Quo
Nothing recorded that Acuity Scheduling does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acuity Scheduling
- Client self-scheduling with automated time zone conversionnot Quo
- HIPAA-compliant scheduling for healthcare practitionersnot Quo
- Multi-location scheduling with multiple staff membersnot Quo
- Membership, package sales, and gift certificate managementnot Quo
Quo
No use cases recorded yet. See the Quo review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acuity Scheduling
- Starter tier limited to 1 calendar only
- SMS/text reminders, memberships, and gift certificates require Standard or Premium tier
- HIPAA compliance (BAA signature) exclusive to Premium tier at $49/month
- Custom API and CSS access, and Acuity branding removal require Premium tier
Quo
- Unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
- Starter tier's $15/user annual rate requires prepaying annually; monthly billing costs $19/user, about 27% more
- The Sona AI agent automation credits are capped at 1,000 free per plan before additional usage is billed
Pricing, plan by plan
Acuity Scheduling
$16/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Acuity Scheduling review.
Quo
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Quo review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Acuity Scheduling if
- You need online booking.
- You also want appointment types.
Questions people ask
- Is Acuity Scheduling or Quo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acuity Scheduling starts at $16/month and Quo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acuity Scheduling or Quo?
- Quo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $16/month for Acuity Scheduling and Free for Quo.
- Does Acuity Scheduling or Quo run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Quo for free?
- Yes. Quo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acuity Scheduling starts at $16/month.
- What is Acuity Scheduling best used for?
- Acuity Scheduling is most often used for client self-scheduling with automated time zone conversion, hipaa-compliant scheduling for healthcare practitioners, multi-location scheduling with multiple staff members, membership, package sales, and gift certificate management. Of those, client self-scheduling with automated time zone conversion and hipaa-compliant scheduling for healthcare practitioners are not what Quo is typically brought in for.
- What can Acuity Scheduling do that Quo cannot?
- Acuity Scheduling covers Online booking, Appointment types, Calendar sync, Payment processing.
Related pages
More on Acuity Scheduling
Other head to heads
- Acuity Scheduling vs Calendly
- Acuity Scheduling vs Cal.com
- Acuity Scheduling vs Motion
- Acuity Scheduling vs Appointlet
- Acuity Scheduling vs Appointy
- Acuity Scheduling vs Setmore
- Acuity Scheduling vs 10to8
- Acuity Scheduling vs Booksy
- Acuity Scheduling vs Boulevard
- Acuity Scheduling vs Doodle
- Acuity Scheduling vs Fresha
- Acuity Scheduling vs GlossGenius
- Acuity Scheduling vs Schedulicity
- Acuity Scheduling vs Square Appointments
- Acuity Scheduling vs When2meet
- Acuity Scheduling vs Zenoti
- Acuity Scheduling vs Airbnb
- Acuity Scheduling vs Booker by Mindbody
- Acuity Scheduling vs Zoom
- Acuity Scheduling vs Microsoft Teams
- Acuity Scheduling vs Loom
- Acuity Scheduling vs RingCentral Video
- Acuity Scheduling vs Slack
- Acuity Scheduling vs Telegram
- Acuity Scheduling vs Webex by Cisco
- Acuity Scheduling vs Chanty
- Acuity Scheduling vs Chatwork
- Acuity Scheduling vs Flock
- Acuity Scheduling vs Google Chat
- Acuity Scheduling vs Grasshopper
- Acuity Scheduling vs Lark
- Acuity Scheduling vs Mattermost
- Acuity Scheduling vs Rocket.Chat
- Acuity Scheduling vs Signal
- Acuity Scheduling vs TeamViewer
- Acuity Scheduling vs Textline
- Quo vs Calendly
- Quo vs Cal.com
- Quo vs Motion
- Quo vs Appointlet
- Quo vs Appointy
- Quo vs Setmore
- Quo vs 10to8
- Quo vs Booksy
- Quo vs Boulevard
- Quo vs Doodle
- Quo vs Fresha
- Quo vs GlossGenius
- Quo vs Schedulicity
- Quo vs Square Appointments
- Quo vs When2meet
- Quo vs Zenoti
- Quo vs Airbnb
- Quo vs Booker by Mindbody
- Quo vs Zoom
- Quo vs Microsoft Teams
- Quo vs Loom
- Quo vs RingCentral Video
- Quo vs Slack
- Quo vs Telegram
- Quo vs Webex by Cisco
- Quo vs Chanty
- Quo vs Chatwork
- Quo vs Flock
- Quo vs Google Chat
- Quo vs Grasshopper
- Quo vs Lark
- Quo vs Mattermost
- Quo vs Rocket.Chat
- Quo vs Signal
- Quo vs TeamViewer
- Quo vs Textline