Softwr

Software · head to head

Clari vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Clari logo

Clari

Software

Revenue platform for full-funnel accuracy

From
On request
Rated
-
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint logo

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Software

Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Clari limited customization; built for specific use cases and cannot make predictions outside core objects; Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
  • They diverge on capability: Clari covers Forecast management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clari and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint actually diverge.

Attributes where Clari and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint differ
AttributeClariMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWebWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Founded20121975

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clari

  • Forecast management
  • Pipeline inspection
  • Revenue intelligence
  • Deal signals
  • Activity capture
  • Salesforce
  • Microsoft Dynamics
  • HubSpot

Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

  • Threat & vulnerability management
  • Attack surface reduction
  • Next-gen protection
  • EDR
  • Auto investigation
  • Microsoft Threat Experts
  • Threat analytics
  • Secure score

Both cover

  • ISO 27001

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clari

  • Revenue forecastingnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
  • Pipeline managementnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
  • Deal inspectionnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
  • Revenue planningnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

  • Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not Clari
  • Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot Clari
  • Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not Clari

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clari

  • Limited customization; built for specific use cases and cannot make predictions outside core objects
  • Requires extensive manual data inputs; depends on spreadsheet-based consolidation creating data gaps and inaccurate predictions
  • English-only with no multilingual support for global teams
  • High total cost of ownership including mandatory implementation services and expensive add-ons
  • Overlaps with other tools; if already using Gong or Outreach, Clari duplicates conversation intelligence and engagement features

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

  • Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
  • Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
  • Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation

Pricing, plan by plan

Clari

On request
  • ProfessionalFree
    • Forecast management
    • Pipeline inspection
    • Deal signals
  • EnterpriseFree
    • All Professional features
    • Mutual action plans
    • Revenue intelligence

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Clari if

  • You need forecast management.
  • You also want pipeline inspection.

Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if

  • You need threat & vulnerability management.
  • You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
  • You also want attack surface reduction.

Questions people ask

Is Clari or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better?
Neither clearly leads. Clari starts at On request and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clari or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
Clari starts at On request and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request.
Does Clari or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint run on more platforms?
Clari runs on Web. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
What is Clari best used for?
Clari is most often used for revenue forecasting, pipeline management, deal inspection, revenue planning. Of those, revenue forecasting and pipeline management are not what Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is typically brought in for.
What can Clari do that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot?
Clari covers Forecast management, Pipeline inspection, Revenue intelligence, Deal signals. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR. Both handle ISO 27001.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Clari: What are Clari's core features?

Clari provides revenue AI agents for automated forecasting and deal inspection, real-time pipeline visibility, conversation intelligence via Copilot, data capture and quality management, Groove for sales engagement, and Align for buyer collaboration.

Clari: What integrations does Clari offer?

Clari integrates natively with Salesforce (Classic and Lightning), Slack via Copilot for call insights and notifications, and has a partner API with 40+ integrated solutions available in the Clari Integration Hub.

Related pages

Other head to heads