Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Lazy

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Lazy logo

Lazy

Software

Simple task management that actually works

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Lazy access restricted behind extended waitlist
  • They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, Lazy covers Today focus.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Lazy actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Lazy differ
AttributeAssistant.toLazy
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb, iOS
Founded20142019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Lazy

  • Today focus
  • Simple task lists
  • Natural language input
  • Widgets
  • Keyboard shortcuts
  • Calendar
  • Shortcuts
  • iCloud sync

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Lazy
  • Appointment bookingnot Lazy
  • Time trackingnot Lazy
  • Resource managementnot Lazy
  • Team coordinationnot Lazy

Lazy

  • Productivitynot Assistant.to
  • Collaborationnot Assistant.to
  • Task managementnot Assistant.to
  • Organizationnot Assistant.to

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Lazy

  • Access restricted behind extended waitlist
  • Mobile app read-only, limiting full-time mobile use
  • Slow product development cycle with limited feature updates
  • Customer support difficult to reach with poor ticketing system

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Lazy

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Unlimited tasks
    • Today focus
    • Basic lists
  • Pro$4/month
    • Recurring tasks
    • Calendar sync
    • Themes

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.

Choose Lazy if

  • You need today focus.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, iOS.
  • You also want simple task lists.

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Lazy better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Lazy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Lazy?
Assistant.to starts at Free and Lazy at Free.
Does Assistant.to or Lazy run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Lazy runs on Web, iOS.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Lazy is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Lazy cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. Lazy covers Today focus, Simple task lists, Natural language input, Widgets.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Lazy: What integrations does Lazy support?

Lazy integrates with Notion for direct content capture, includes GPT integration for AI-powered note analysis, and supports content clipping from articles, Twitter, videos, and other web sources.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads