Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Greenhouse

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Software

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Assistant.to has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Greenhouse actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Greenhouse differ
AttributeAssistant.toGreenhouse
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb, Ios, Android, Api
Founded20142012

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance

Both cover

  • Google Calendar

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Greenhouse
  • Appointment bookingnot Greenhouse
  • Time trackingnot Greenhouse
  • Resource managementnot Greenhouse
  • Team coordinationnot Greenhouse

Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Assistant.to
  • AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Assistant.to

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want interview scheduling.
Greenhouse review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Greenhouse better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Greenhouse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Greenhouse?
Assistant.to has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Assistant.to and On request for Greenhouse.
Does Assistant.to or Greenhouse run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Yes. Assistant.to has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Greenhouse is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Greenhouse cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Both handle Google Calendar.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Greenhouse

Keep looking

Other head to heads