Software · head to head
3DEC vs GraphHopper

GraphHopper
Software
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, GraphHopper covers Core Functionality.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and GraphHopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | 3DEC | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web |
| Founded | 1981 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot GraphHopper
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot GraphHopper
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot GraphHopper
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot GraphHopper
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot GraphHopper
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot 3DEC
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or GraphHopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and GraphHopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or GraphHopper?
- 3DEC starts at On request and GraphHopper at On request.
- Does 3DEC or GraphHopper run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. GraphHopper runs on Web.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what GraphHopper is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that GraphHopper cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs Datamine
- 3DEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- 3DEC vs Trimble Mining
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Carlson Mining
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- 3DEC vs Mapbox
- 3DEC vs Google Maps Platform
- 3DEC vs HERE Technologies
- 3DEC vs Apple Maps
- 3DEC vs Leaflet
- 3DEC vs Esri ArcGIS
- 3DEC vs CesiumJS
- 3DEC vs Samsara
- 3DEC vs Bing Maps
- 3DEC vs CARTO
- 3DEC vs Geotab
- 3DEC vs HERE WeGo
- 3DEC vs IndoorAtlas
- 3DEC vs Mappedin
- 3DEC vs Verizon Connect
- 3DEC vs AllTrails
- 3DEC vs Citymapper
- 3DEC vs deck.gl
- GraphHopper vs Caterpillar MineStar
- GraphHopper vs Leapfrog Geo
- GraphHopper vs Deswik Suite
- GraphHopper vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- GraphHopper vs Datamine
- GraphHopper vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- GraphHopper vs Micromine
- GraphHopper vs Datamine Studio RM
- GraphHopper vs Maptek I-Site
- GraphHopper vs Minemax
- GraphHopper vs Promine
- GraphHopper vs Surpac
- GraphHopper vs Trimble Mining
- GraphHopper vs Vulcan
- GraphHopper vs acQuire GIM Suite
- GraphHopper vs Carlson Mining
- GraphHopper vs Cority EHS
- GraphHopper vs Enablon EHS
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
