Maps & Navigation · head to head
GraphHopper vs Surpac

GraphHopper
Maps & Navigation
Open-source routing engine for road networks, providing fast route calculations, turn-by-turn navigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Surpac
Mining & Resources
Geology and mine planning software for all mining methods
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphHopper the free plan is non commercial use only; Surpac 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
- They diverge on capability: GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, Surpac covers Geological database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphHopper and Surpac actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphHopper | Surpac |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Windows |
| Category | Maps & Navigation | Mining & Resources |
| Founded | Unknown | 1981 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphHopper
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Surpac
- Geological database
- Block modeling
- Mine design
- Resource estimation
- Workflow automation
- MineSched
- PCBC
- Whittle
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphHopper
- Routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an APInot Surpac
- Map matching GPS traces and generating isochronesnot Surpac
Surpac
- Geological modelingnot GraphHopper
- Mine planningnot GraphHopper
- Resource estimationnot GraphHopper
- Grade controlnot GraphHopper
- Production trackingnot GraphHopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphHopper
- The free plan is non commercial use only
- Free allows 500 credits a day, 5 locations per request and a single vehicle
- Request complexity is capped per plan, at 30 locations and 2 vehicles on Basic at 69 EUR a month, rising to 200 locations and 20 vehicles on Premium at 479 EUR
- Isochrone range is limited by plan, at 15 minutes on Basic and 30 on Premium
- Credits are a daily allowance, so a busy day cannot draw on a quiet one
Surpac
- 3ds.com's Surpac page describes nine product modules in detail but every pricing action is a 'Speak with an expert' or 'Contact us' CTA, with no edition names or figures published
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphHopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GraphHopper review.
Surpac
On request- Surpac Core$6000/year
- 3D visualization
- Geological database
- Surface modeling
- Surpac Advanced$12000/year
- Block modeling
- Resource estimation
- Mine design
- Surpac Complete$20000/year
- All modules
- Underground planning
- Scheduling integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Surpac if
- You need geological database.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want block modeling.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphHopper or Surpac better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphHopper starts at On request and Surpac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphHopper or Surpac?
- GraphHopper starts at On request and Surpac at On request.
- Does GraphHopper or Surpac run on more platforms?
- GraphHopper runs on Web. Surpac runs on Windows.
- What is GraphHopper best used for?
- GraphHopper is most often used for routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api, map matching gps traces and generating isochrones. Of those, routing, distance matrix and route optimisation over an api and map matching gps traces and generating isochrones are not what Surpac is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphHopper do that Surpac cannot?
- GraphHopper covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Surpac covers Geological database, Block modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation.
Related pages
More on GraphHopper
Other head to heads
- GraphHopper vs Mapbox
- GraphHopper vs Google Maps Platform
- GraphHopper vs HERE Technologies
- GraphHopper vs Apple Maps
- GraphHopper vs Leaflet
- GraphHopper vs Esri ArcGIS
- GraphHopper vs CesiumJS
- GraphHopper vs Samsara
- GraphHopper vs Bing Maps
- GraphHopper vs CARTO
- GraphHopper vs Geotab
- GraphHopper vs HERE WeGo
- GraphHopper vs IndoorAtlas
- GraphHopper vs Mappedin
- GraphHopper vs Verizon Connect
- GraphHopper vs AllTrails
- GraphHopper vs Citymapper
- GraphHopper vs deck.gl
- GraphHopper vs Caterpillar MineStar
- GraphHopper vs Leapfrog Geo
- GraphHopper vs Deswik Suite
- GraphHopper vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- GraphHopper vs Datamine
- GraphHopper vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- GraphHopper vs Micromine
- GraphHopper vs Datamine Studio RM
- GraphHopper vs Maptek I-Site
- GraphHopper vs Minemax
- GraphHopper vs Promine
- GraphHopper vs Trimble Mining
- GraphHopper vs Vulcan
- GraphHopper vs 3DEC
- GraphHopper vs acQuire GIM Suite
- GraphHopper vs Carlson Mining
- GraphHopper vs Cority EHS
- GraphHopper vs Enablon EHS
- Surpac vs Mapbox
- Surpac vs Google Maps Platform
- Surpac vs HERE Technologies
- Surpac vs Apple Maps
- Surpac vs Leaflet
- Surpac vs Esri ArcGIS
- Surpac vs CesiumJS
- Surpac vs Samsara
- Surpac vs Bing Maps
- Surpac vs CARTO
- Surpac vs Geotab
- Surpac vs HERE WeGo
- Surpac vs IndoorAtlas
- Surpac vs Mappedin
- Surpac vs Verizon Connect
- Surpac vs AllTrails
- Surpac vs Citymapper
- Surpac vs deck.gl
- Surpac vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Surpac vs Leapfrog Geo
- Surpac vs Deswik Suite
- Surpac vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Surpac vs Datamine
- Surpac vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Surpac vs Micromine
- Surpac vs Datamine Studio RM
- Surpac vs Maptek I-Site
- Surpac vs Minemax
- Surpac vs Promine
- Surpac vs Trimble Mining
- Surpac vs Vulcan
- Surpac vs 3DEC
- Surpac vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Surpac vs Carlson Mining
- Surpac vs Cority EHS
- Surpac vs Enablon EHS
