Mining & Resources · head to head
3DEC vs deck.gl
3
3DEC
Mining & Resources
3D distinct element code for underground mining
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

deck.gl
Maps & Navigation
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, deck.gl covers Core Functionality.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and deck.gl actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
Only in deck.gl
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot deck.gl
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot deck.gl
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot deck.gl
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot deck.gl
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot deck.gl
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot 3DEC
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot 3DEC
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot 3DEC
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot 3DEC
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
deck.gl
- deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
deck.gl
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or deck.gl better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and deck.gl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or deck.gl?
- 3DEC starts at On request and deck.gl at On request.
- Does 3DEC or deck.gl run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. deck.gl runs on Web.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what deck.gl is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that deck.gl cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs Datamine
- 3DEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- 3DEC vs Trimble Mining
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Carlson Mining
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- 3DEC vs Mapbox
- 3DEC vs Google Maps Platform
- 3DEC vs HERE Technologies
- 3DEC vs Apple Maps
- 3DEC vs Leaflet
- 3DEC vs Esri ArcGIS
- 3DEC vs CesiumJS
- 3DEC vs Samsara
- 3DEC vs Bing Maps
- 3DEC vs CARTO
- 3DEC vs Geotab
- 3DEC vs GraphHopper
- 3DEC vs HERE WeGo
- 3DEC vs IndoorAtlas
- 3DEC vs Mappedin
- 3DEC vs Verizon Connect
- 3DEC vs AllTrails
- 3DEC vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs Caterpillar MineStar
- deck.gl vs Leapfrog Geo
- deck.gl vs Deswik Suite
- deck.gl vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- deck.gl vs Datamine
- deck.gl vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- deck.gl vs Micromine
- deck.gl vs Datamine Studio RM
- deck.gl vs Maptek I-Site
- deck.gl vs Minemax
- deck.gl vs Promine
- deck.gl vs Surpac
- deck.gl vs Trimble Mining
- deck.gl vs Vulcan
- deck.gl vs acQuire GIM Suite
- deck.gl vs Carlson Mining
- deck.gl vs Cority EHS
- deck.gl vs Enablon EHS
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Leaflet
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs CesiumJS
- deck.gl vs Samsara
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs CARTO
- deck.gl vs Geotab
- deck.gl vs GraphHopper
- deck.gl vs HERE WeGo
- deck.gl vs IndoorAtlas
- deck.gl vs Mappedin
- deck.gl vs Verizon Connect
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
