Software · head to head
3DEC vs Bing Maps

Bing Maps
Software
Web mapping services with street maps, aerial imagery, and APIs for developers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; Bing Maps bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Bing Maps covers Core Functionality.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and Bing Maps actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
Only in Bing Maps
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot Bing Maps
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot Bing Maps
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot Bing Maps
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot Bing Maps
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot Bing Maps
Bing Maps
No use cases recorded yet. See the Bing Maps review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
Bing Maps
- Bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
Bing Maps
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bing Maps review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or Bing Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and Bing Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or Bing Maps?
- 3DEC starts at On request and Bing Maps at On request.
- Does 3DEC or Bing Maps run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. Bing Maps runs on Web.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what Bing Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that Bing Maps cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs Datamine
- 3DEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- 3DEC vs Trimble Mining
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Carlson Mining
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- 3DEC vs Mapbox
- 3DEC vs Google Maps Platform
- 3DEC vs HERE Technologies
- 3DEC vs Apple Maps
- 3DEC vs Leaflet
- 3DEC vs Esri ArcGIS
- 3DEC vs CesiumJS
- 3DEC vs Samsara
- 3DEC vs CARTO
- 3DEC vs Geotab
- 3DEC vs GraphHopper
- 3DEC vs HERE WeGo
- 3DEC vs IndoorAtlas
- 3DEC vs Mappedin
- 3DEC vs Verizon Connect
- 3DEC vs AllTrails
- 3DEC vs Citymapper
- 3DEC vs deck.gl
- Bing Maps vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Bing Maps vs Leapfrog Geo
- Bing Maps vs Deswik Suite
- Bing Maps vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Bing Maps vs Datamine
- Bing Maps vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Bing Maps vs Micromine
- Bing Maps vs Datamine Studio RM
- Bing Maps vs Maptek I-Site
- Bing Maps vs Minemax
- Bing Maps vs Promine
- Bing Maps vs Surpac
- Bing Maps vs Trimble Mining
- Bing Maps vs Vulcan
- Bing Maps vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Bing Maps vs Carlson Mining
- Bing Maps vs Cority EHS
- Bing Maps vs Enablon EHS
- Bing Maps vs Mapbox
- Bing Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Bing Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Bing Maps vs Apple Maps
- Bing Maps vs Leaflet
- Bing Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Bing Maps vs CesiumJS
- Bing Maps vs Samsara
- Bing Maps vs CARTO
- Bing Maps vs Geotab
- Bing Maps vs GraphHopper
- Bing Maps vs HERE WeGo
- Bing Maps vs IndoorAtlas
- Bing Maps vs Mappedin
- Bing Maps vs Verizon Connect
- Bing Maps vs AllTrails
- Bing Maps vs Citymapper
- Bing Maps vs deck.gl
