Software · head to head
3DEC vs Esri ArcGIS
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; Esri ArcGIS arcGIS Online is cloud-based only; self-hosted deployment requires separate ArcGIS Enterprise licence
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Esri ArcGIS covers Mapping & Visualization.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and Esri ArcGIS actually diverge.
| Attribute | 3DEC | Esri ArcGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web, Mobile (field apps), Desktop |
| Founded | 1981 | 1969 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
Only in Esri ArcGIS
- Mapping & Visualization
- Spatial Analysis
- Data Management
- Field Operations
- Real-time Analytics
- AutoCAD
- SAP
- Microsoft Office
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot Esri ArcGIS
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot Esri ArcGIS
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot Esri ArcGIS
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot Esri ArcGIS
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot Esri ArcGIS
Esri ArcGIS
- Geospatial mapping and spatial analysisnot 3DEC
- Enterprise data governance and managementnot 3DEC
- Real-time field data collectionnot 3DEC
- AI-assisted geospatial analysisnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
Esri ArcGIS
- ArcGIS Online is cloud-based only; self-hosted deployment requires separate ArcGIS Enterprise licence
- Field and offline workflows require advanced capabilities; basic plans may lack offline synchronisation
- Pricing details not published; customers must contact sales for quotes
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
Esri ArcGIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Esri ArcGIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Choose Esri ArcGIS if
- You need mapping & visualization.
- You work on Web, Mobile (field apps), Desktop.
- You also want spatial analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or Esri ArcGIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and Esri ArcGIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or Esri ArcGIS?
- 3DEC starts at On request and Esri ArcGIS at On request.
- Does 3DEC or Esri ArcGIS run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. Esri ArcGIS runs on Web, Mobile (field apps), Desktop.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what Esri ArcGIS is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that Esri ArcGIS cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. Esri ArcGIS covers Mapping & Visualization, Spatial Analysis, Data Management, Field Operations.
Related pages
More on Esri ArcGIS
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs Datamine
- 3DEC vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- 3DEC vs Micromine
- 3DEC vs Datamine Studio RM
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Minemax
- 3DEC vs Promine
- 3DEC vs Surpac
- 3DEC vs Trimble Mining
- 3DEC vs Vulcan
- 3DEC vs acQuire GIM Suite
- 3DEC vs Carlson Mining
- 3DEC vs Cority EHS
- 3DEC vs Enablon EHS
- 3DEC vs Mapbox
- 3DEC vs Google Maps Platform
- 3DEC vs HERE Technologies
- 3DEC vs Apple Maps
- 3DEC vs Leaflet
- 3DEC vs CesiumJS
- 3DEC vs Samsara
- 3DEC vs Bing Maps
- 3DEC vs CARTO
- 3DEC vs Geotab
- 3DEC vs GraphHopper
- 3DEC vs HERE WeGo
- 3DEC vs IndoorAtlas
- 3DEC vs Mappedin
- 3DEC vs Verizon Connect
- 3DEC vs AllTrails
- 3DEC vs Citymapper
- 3DEC vs deck.gl
- Esri ArcGIS vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Esri ArcGIS vs Leapfrog Geo
- Esri ArcGIS vs Deswik Suite
- Esri ArcGIS vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Esri ArcGIS vs Datamine
- Esri ArcGIS vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- Esri ArcGIS vs Micromine
- Esri ArcGIS vs Datamine Studio RM
- Esri ArcGIS vs Maptek I-Site
- Esri ArcGIS vs Minemax
- Esri ArcGIS vs Promine
- Esri ArcGIS vs Surpac
- Esri ArcGIS vs Trimble Mining
- Esri ArcGIS vs Vulcan
- Esri ArcGIS vs acQuire GIM Suite
- Esri ArcGIS vs Carlson Mining
- Esri ArcGIS vs Cority EHS
- Esri ArcGIS vs Enablon EHS
- Esri ArcGIS vs Mapbox
- Esri ArcGIS vs Google Maps Platform
- Esri ArcGIS vs HERE Technologies
- Esri ArcGIS vs Apple Maps
- Esri ArcGIS vs Leaflet
- Esri ArcGIS vs CesiumJS
- Esri ArcGIS vs Samsara
- Esri ArcGIS vs Bing Maps
- Esri ArcGIS vs CARTO
- Esri ArcGIS vs Geotab
- Esri ArcGIS vs GraphHopper
- Esri ArcGIS vs HERE WeGo
- Esri ArcGIS vs IndoorAtlas
- Esri ArcGIS vs Mappedin
- Esri ArcGIS vs Verizon Connect
- Esri ArcGIS vs AllTrails
- Esri ArcGIS vs Citymapper
- Esri ArcGIS vs deck.gl

