Software · head to head
Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Plasticity
Microsoft HoloLens 2
Software
Enterprise mixed reality for the modern workplace
- From
- $3500/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft HoloLens 2 narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close; Plasticity limited plugin ecosystem compared to Rhino; fewer third-party extensions available
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Plasticity covers Smooth surface modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Plasticity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft HoloLens 2 | Plasticity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3500/one-time | On request |
| Platforms | Standalone AR Headset | Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu |
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Spatial mapping
- Hand tracking
- Eye tracking
- Holographic display
- Azure
- Dynamics 365
- Microsoft Teams
- Mixed-reality support
Only in Plasticity
- Smooth surface modeling
- Fillet operations
- Boolean operations
- Mesh export
- Fast workflow
- Artist-friendly
- Blender
- Game engines
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- VR Gamingnot Plasticity
- AR Marketingnot Plasticity
- Virtual Trainingnot Plasticity
- 3D Visualizationnot Plasticity
- Immersive Experiencesnot Plasticity
Plasticity
- Concept designnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Hard surface modelingnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
- Heavy weight makes extended wearing uncomfortable and impractical for sessions longer than a few hours
- Short battery life of 2.5 to 5.5 hours limits extended deployments without charging
- Display is sensitive to bright light and sunlight, with rainbow color artifacts and poor outdoor readability
- High price of $3,500 limits accessibility to enterprises with substantial budgets
Plasticity
- Limited plugin ecosystem compared to Rhino; fewer third-party extensions available
- Young product with shorter track record; fewer industry case studies and community resources
- No parametric history tree; may require different workflow for some users accustomed to feature-based modeling
- Premium pricing for Indie users despite being positioned as affordable alternative
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft HoloLens 2
$3500/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft HoloLens 2 review.
Plasticity
On request- Indie$149/one-time
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft HoloLens 2 if
- You need spatial mapping.
- You work on Standalone AR Headset.
- You also want hand tracking.
Choose Plasticity if
- You need smooth surface modeling.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu.
- You also want fillet operations.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Plasticity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time and Plasticity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Plasticity?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time and Plasticity at On request.
- Does Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Plasticity run on more platforms?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 runs on Standalone AR Headset. Plasticity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Ubuntu.
- What is Microsoft HoloLens 2 best used for?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 is most often used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization. Of those, vr gaming and ar marketing are not what Plasticity is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft HoloLens 2 do that Plasticity cannot?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Hand tracking, Eye tracking, Holographic display. Plasticity covers Smooth surface modeling, Fillet operations, Boolean operations, Mesh export. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft HoloLens 2: How long is the battery life of HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 battery life is 2.5 to 5.5 hours of active use depending on workload intensity and brightness settings.
SourcePlasticity: What is Plasticity designed for?
Plasticity is a NURBS-based 3D modeler designed for concept and product design, prioritizing an artist-friendly workflow over parametric history-based modeling.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the field of view for HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 has a 52-degree field of view (43 degrees horizontal and 29 degrees vertical), which is considered narrow and limits the visible hologram area when viewing objects up close.
SourcePlasticity: What platforms does Plasticity support?
Plasticity runs on Windows, macOS (Intel and M-Series), Linux, and Ubuntu using Parasolid's geometric modeling kernel.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: Can HoloLens 2 be worn over glasses?
Yes, HoloLens 2 can be worn directly over glasses with an ergonomic design that allows the visor to flip up, though comfort depends on the glasses' size and weight.
SourcePlasticity: What is the pricing model for Plasticity?
Plasticity is a one-time purchase: Indie tier costs $149 and Studio tier is available at a higher price point. A 30-day free trial is available.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the price of HoloLens 2?
The HoloLens 2 costs $3,500 USD with enterprise rental options at $125 per month and developer rental at $99 per month.
SourcePlasticity: Does Plasticity integrate with Blender?
Yes. Plasticity includes a Blender Bridge add-on that enables live-linking between Plasticity and Blender, allowing you to preview Plasticity models inside Blender with proper materials and lighting.
SourcePlasticity: What key features distinguish Plasticity from other CAD tools?
Plasticity features streamlined UI with context-sensitive widgets, chordal fillets, key bindings familiar to Blender users, radial menus, Dimension and Measure commands for absolute constraints, and handles complex Boolean operations on dense geometry.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft HoloLens 2
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARCore
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARKit
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Meta Quest
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Apple Vision Pro
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Unity AR Foundation
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs HTC Vive
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 8th Wall
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lens Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Vuforia
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs A-Frame
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Babylon.js
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Niantic Lightship
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PlayStation VR2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Spark AR Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs TikTok Effect House
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Gravity Sketch
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Instagram AR Effects
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Enscape
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs V-Ray
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs FreeCAD
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs KeyShot
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lumion
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Houdini
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Arnold
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Inventor
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Mudbox
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Corona Renderer
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs D5 Render
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Twinmotion
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs LightWave 3D
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs OpenSCAD
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PrusaSlicer
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Siemens NX
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ZBrush
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 3D-Coat
- Plasticity vs ARCore
- Plasticity vs ARKit
- Plasticity vs Meta Quest
- Plasticity vs Apple Vision Pro
- Plasticity vs Unity AR Foundation
- Plasticity vs HTC Vive
- Plasticity vs 8th Wall
- Plasticity vs Lens Studio
- Plasticity vs Vuforia
- Plasticity vs A-Frame
- Plasticity vs Babylon.js
- Plasticity vs Niantic Lightship
- Plasticity vs PlayStation VR2
- Plasticity vs Spark AR Studio
- Plasticity vs TikTok Effect House
- Plasticity vs Gravity Sketch
- Plasticity vs Instagram AR Effects
- Plasticity vs Magic Leap 2
- Plasticity vs Enscape
- Plasticity vs V-Ray
- Plasticity vs FreeCAD
- Plasticity vs KeyShot
- Plasticity vs Lumion
- Plasticity vs Houdini
- Plasticity vs Arnold
- Plasticity vs Inventor
- Plasticity vs Mudbox
- Plasticity vs Corona Renderer
- Plasticity vs D5 Render
- Plasticity vs Twinmotion
- Plasticity vs LightWave 3D
- Plasticity vs OpenSCAD
- Plasticity vs PrusaSlicer
- Plasticity vs Siemens NX
- Plasticity vs ZBrush
- Plasticity vs 3D-Coat

