Software · head to head
Inventor vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
Microsoft HoloLens 2
Software
Enterprise mixed reality for the modern workplace
- From
- $3500/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Inventor autodesk publishes no licence price through UK G-Cloud: every listing found there is reseller delivered training at 750 to 1,500 pounds per day rather than software licensing, and neither AWS Marketplace nor GSA carries the product; Microsoft HoloLens 2 narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
- They diverge on capability: Inventor covers Parametric modeling, Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Inventor and Microsoft HoloLens 2 actually diverge.
| Attribute | Inventor | Microsoft HoloLens 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | $3500/one-time |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Windows | Standalone AR Headset |
| Founded | 1982 | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Inventor
- Parametric modeling
- Assembly design
- Sheet metal
- Simulation
- Rendering
- Technical documentation
- Frame generator
- AutoCAD
Only in Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Spatial mapping
- Hand tracking
- Eye tracking
- Holographic display
- Azure
- Dynamics 365
- Microsoft Teams
- Mixed-reality support
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Inventor
- Mechanical designnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Product developmentnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Manufacturing documentationnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- VR Gamingnot Inventor
- AR Marketingnot Inventor
- Virtual Trainingnot Inventor
- 3D Visualizationnot Inventor
- Immersive Experiencesnot Inventor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Inventor
- Autodesk publishes no licence price through UK G-Cloud: every listing found there is reseller delivered training at 750 to 1,500 pounds per day rather than software licensing, and neither AWS Marketplace nor GSA carries the product
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
- Heavy weight makes extended wearing uncomfortable and impractical for sessions longer than a few hours
- Short battery life of 2.5 to 5.5 hours limits extended deployments without charging
- Display is sensitive to bright light and sunlight, with rainbow color artifacts and poor outdoor readability
- High price of $3,500 limits accessibility to enterprises with substantial budgets
Pricing, plan by plan
Inventor
$29/month- Inventor$2085/month
- Full mechanical design
- Simulation
- Documentation
- Product Design & Manufacturing Collection$2475/month
- Inventor + AutoCAD + more
Microsoft HoloLens 2
$3500/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft HoloLens 2 review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Inventor if
- You need parametric modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Choose Microsoft HoloLens 2 if
- You need spatial mapping.
- You work on Standalone AR Headset.
- You also want hand tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Inventor or Microsoft HoloLens 2 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Inventor starts at $29/month and Microsoft HoloLens 2 at $3500/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Inventor or Microsoft HoloLens 2?
- Inventor starts at $29/month and Microsoft HoloLens 2 at $3500/one-time.
- Does Inventor or Microsoft HoloLens 2 run on more platforms?
- Inventor runs on Windows. Microsoft HoloLens 2 runs on Standalone AR Headset.
- What is Inventor best used for?
- Inventor is most often used for mechanical design, product development, manufacturing documentation. Of those, mechanical design and product development are not what Microsoft HoloLens 2 is typically brought in for.
- What can Inventor do that Microsoft HoloLens 2 cannot?
- Inventor covers Parametric modeling, Assembly design, Sheet metal, Simulation. Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Hand tracking, Eye tracking, Holographic display. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft HoloLens 2: How long is the battery life of HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 battery life is 2.5 to 5.5 hours of active use depending on workload intensity and brightness settings.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the field of view for HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 has a 52-degree field of view (43 degrees horizontal and 29 degrees vertical), which is considered narrow and limits the visible hologram area when viewing objects up close.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: Can HoloLens 2 be worn over glasses?
Yes, HoloLens 2 can be worn directly over glasses with an ergonomic design that allows the visor to flip up, though comfort depends on the glasses' size and weight.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the price of HoloLens 2?
The HoloLens 2 costs $3,500 USD with enterprise rental options at $125 per month and developer rental at $99 per month.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft HoloLens 2
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Inventor vs Enscape
- Inventor vs V-Ray
- Inventor vs FreeCAD
- Inventor vs KeyShot
- Inventor vs Lumion
- Inventor vs Houdini
- Inventor vs Arnold
- Inventor vs Mudbox
- Inventor vs Corona Renderer
- Inventor vs D5 Render
- Inventor vs Twinmotion
- Inventor vs LightWave 3D
- Inventor vs OpenSCAD
- Inventor vs PrusaSlicer
- Inventor vs Siemens NX
- Inventor vs ZBrush
- Inventor vs 3D-Coat
- Inventor vs Alibre Design
- Inventor vs ARCore
- Inventor vs ARKit
- Inventor vs Meta Quest
- Inventor vs Apple Vision Pro
- Inventor vs Unity AR Foundation
- Inventor vs HTC Vive
- Inventor vs 8th Wall
- Inventor vs Lens Studio
- Inventor vs Vuforia
- Inventor vs A-Frame
- Inventor vs Babylon.js
- Inventor vs Niantic Lightship
- Inventor vs PlayStation VR2
- Inventor vs Spark AR Studio
- Inventor vs TikTok Effect House
- Inventor vs Gravity Sketch
- Inventor vs Instagram AR Effects
- Inventor vs Magic Leap 2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Enscape
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs V-Ray
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs FreeCAD
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs KeyShot
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lumion
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Houdini
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Arnold
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Mudbox
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Corona Renderer
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs D5 Render
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Twinmotion
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs LightWave 3D
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs OpenSCAD
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PrusaSlicer
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Siemens NX
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ZBrush
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 3D-Coat
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Alibre Design
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARCore
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARKit
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Meta Quest
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Apple Vision Pro
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Unity AR Foundation
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs HTC Vive
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 8th Wall
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lens Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Vuforia
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs A-Frame
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Babylon.js
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Niantic Lightship
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PlayStation VR2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Spark AR Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs TikTok Effect House
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Gravity Sketch
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Instagram AR Effects
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2