Software · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs NAPA

IndoorAtlas
Software
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; NAPA the Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
- They diverge on capability: IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, NAPA covers Ship design.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and NAPA actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | NAPA |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $5000/year |
| Pricing model | Unknown | one-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2012 | 1989 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in NAPA
- Ship design
- Stability calculation
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- CAD systems
- Fleet management
- Weather routing
- Windows support
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
NAPA
- The Internet Archive's capture of NAPA's homepage on 1 January 2020 named six distinct maritime software products, NAPA Loading Computer, NAPA Emergency Computer, NAPA Logbook, NAPA Fleet Intelligence, NAPA Voyage Optimization and ClassNK-NAPA GREEN, with no price figure published for any.
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- Development$400/month
- Free tier available
- Production$349/month
- Per-venue subscription
- Multi-layer sensor fusion
NAPA
$5000/year- Fleet Intelligence$15000/year
- Voyage optimization
- Performance monitoring
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want user interface.
Choose NAPA if
- You need ship design.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want stability calculation.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or NAPA better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and NAPA at $5000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or NAPA?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and $5000/year for NAPA.
- Does IndoorAtlas or NAPA run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. NAPA runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NAPA starts at $5000/year.
- What can IndoorAtlas do that NAPA cannot?
- IndoorAtlas covers Core Functionality, User Interface. NAPA covers Ship design, Stability calculation, Voyage optimization, Performance monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE Technologies
- IndoorAtlas vs Apple Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Leaflet
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs Samsara
- IndoorAtlas vs Bing Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs CARTO
- IndoorAtlas vs Geotab
- IndoorAtlas vs GraphHopper
- IndoorAtlas vs HERE WeGo
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Verizon Connect
- IndoorAtlas vs AllTrails
- IndoorAtlas vs Citymapper
- IndoorAtlas vs deck.gl
- IndoorAtlas vs MarineTraffic
- IndoorAtlas vs ChartCo
- IndoorAtlas vs Kongsberg Maritime
- IndoorAtlas vs Sea Machines
- IndoorAtlas vs Veson Nautical
- IndoorAtlas vs Wartsila Voyage
- IndoorAtlas vs Windward
- IndoorAtlas vs Dataloy
- IndoorAtlas vs DNV Maritime
- IndoorAtlas vs exactEarth
- IndoorAtlas vs FourKites
- IndoorAtlas vs Freightos
- IndoorAtlas vs INTTRA
- IndoorAtlas vs Kpler
- IndoorAtlas vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- IndoorAtlas vs Nautilus Labs
- IndoorAtlas vs Navis N4
- IndoorAtlas vs NAVTOR
- NAPA vs Mapbox
- NAPA vs Google Maps Platform
- NAPA vs HERE Technologies
- NAPA vs Apple Maps
- NAPA vs Leaflet
- NAPA vs Esri ArcGIS
- NAPA vs CesiumJS
- NAPA vs Samsara
- NAPA vs Bing Maps
- NAPA vs CARTO
- NAPA vs Geotab
- NAPA vs GraphHopper
- NAPA vs HERE WeGo
- NAPA vs Mappedin
- NAPA vs Verizon Connect
- NAPA vs AllTrails
- NAPA vs Citymapper
- NAPA vs deck.gl
- NAPA vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA vs ChartCo
- NAPA vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA vs Sea Machines
- NAPA vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA vs Wartsila Voyage
- NAPA vs Windward
- NAPA vs Dataloy
- NAPA vs DNV Maritime
- NAPA vs exactEarth
- NAPA vs FourKites
- NAPA vs Freightos
- NAPA vs INTTRA
- NAPA vs Kpler
- NAPA vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- NAPA vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA vs Navis N4
- NAPA vs NAVTOR

