Software · head to head
Vagrant vs Zerto
The short version
- Only Vagrant has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Zerto zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
- They diverge on capability: Vagrant covers Box management, Zerto covers Continuous data protection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Vagrant and Zerto actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Only in Zerto
- Continuous data protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Automated failover
- Non-disruptive testing
- Multi-cloud mobility
- Long-term retention
- Azure
- Google Cloud
Both cover
- VMware
- AWS
- Hyper-V
- Linux support
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Zerto
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Zerto
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Zerto
Zerto
- Data protectionnot Vagrant
- Disaster recoverynot Vagrant
- Business continuitynot Vagrant
- Ransomware protectionnot Vagrant
- Compliancenot Vagrant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Zerto
- Zerto with Azure is listed on UK G-Cloud as a reseller-managed disaster recovery service, not Zerto's own licence pricing, with OS management from £75 per host per month for the public sector
Pricing, plan by plan
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Zerto
$5/month- Zerto Enterprise Cloud$5/month
- Continuous protection
- Journal-based recovery
- Multi-cloud mobility
Which should you pick?
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Choose Zerto if
- You need continuous data protection.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want journal-based recovery.
Questions people ask
- Is Vagrant or Zerto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Vagrant starts at Free and Zerto at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Vagrant or Zerto?
- Vagrant has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Vagrant and $5/month for Zerto.
- Does Vagrant or Zerto run on more platforms?
- Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac. Zerto runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Vagrant for free?
- Yes. Vagrant has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zerto starts at $5/month.
- What is Vagrant best used for?
- Vagrant is most often used for reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile, provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team, sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptop. Of those, reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile and provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team are not what Zerto is typically brought in for.
- What can Vagrant do that Zerto cannot?
- Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Zerto covers Continuous data protection, Journal-based recovery, Automated failover, Non-disruptive testing. Both handle VMware, AWS, Hyper-V, Linux support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vagrant vs Deno Deploy
- Vagrant vs Heroku
- Vagrant vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Packer
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Render
- Vagrant vs Upstash
- Vagrant vs Vultr
- Vagrant vs Akamai
- Vagrant vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vagrant vs Chef
- Vagrant vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Vagrant vs Carbonite
- Vagrant vs Backblaze
- Vagrant vs Barracuda Backup
- Vagrant vs Arq Backup
- Vagrant vs CrashPlan
- Vagrant vs Duplicati
- Vagrant vs Box
- Vagrant vs IDrive
- Vagrant vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Vagrant vs Nextcloud
- Vagrant vs pCloud
- Vagrant vs Sync.com
- Vagrant vs Tresorit
- Vagrant vs TrueNAS
- Vagrant vs Veritas NetBackup
- Zerto vs Grafana Cloud
- Zerto vs Neon
- Zerto vs DigitalOcean
- Zerto vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zerto vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zerto vs Deno Deploy
- Zerto vs Heroku
- Zerto vs Hetzner Cloud
- Zerto vs Linode
- Zerto vs Packer
- Zerto vs Pulumi
- Zerto vs Render
- Zerto vs Upstash
- Zerto vs Vultr
- Zerto vs Akamai
- Zerto vs Alibaba Cloud
- Zerto vs Chef
- Zerto vs Contabo
- Zerto vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Zerto vs Carbonite
- Zerto vs Backblaze
- Zerto vs Barracuda Backup
- Zerto vs Arq Backup
- Zerto vs CrashPlan
- Zerto vs Duplicati
- Zerto vs Box
- Zerto vs IDrive
- Zerto vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Zerto vs Nextcloud
- Zerto vs pCloud
- Zerto vs Sync.com
- Zerto vs Tresorit
- Zerto vs TrueNAS
- Zerto vs Veritas NetBackup


