Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Heroku vs Okta
The short version
- Only Okta has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
Both cover
- Slack
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Okta
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Okta
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Heroku
- Customer identitynot Heroku
- B2B integrationnot Heroku
- Zero Trust securitynot Heroku
- Compliancenot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Okta?
- Okta has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Okta.
- Does Heroku or Okta run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Okta for free?
- Yes. Okta has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Okta cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Both handle Slack.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Asana
- Heroku vs ClickUp
- Heroku vs Figma
- Heroku vs Linear
- Heroku vs Monday.com
- Heroku vs Greenhouse
- Heroku vs Notion
- Heroku vs Amplitude
- Heroku vs Datadog
- Heroku vs PostHog
- Heroku vs PyCharm
- Heroku vs Sketch
- Heroku vs Docker
- Heroku vs Netlify
- Heroku vs Aha!
- Heroku vs Coda
- Heroku vs Dashlane
- Heroku vs GitHub
- Okta vs Grafana Cloud
- Okta vs Neon
- Okta vs DigitalOcean
- Okta vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Okta vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Okta vs Deno Deploy
- Okta vs Hetzner Cloud
- Okta vs Linode
- Okta vs Packer
- Okta vs Pulumi
- Okta vs Render
- Okta vs Upstash
- Okta vs Vagrant
- Okta vs Vultr
- Okta vs Akamai
- Okta vs Alibaba Cloud
- Okta vs Chef
- Okta vs Contabo
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub


