Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Heroku
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Heroku covers Git-based deployment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Heroku actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Heroku |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $7/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, Api, Workers |
| Category | Technology | Cloud & Infrastructure |
| Founded | 2012 | 2007 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Both cover
- Slack
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Heroku
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Heroku
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Greenhouse
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Greenhouse
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Heroku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Heroku at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Heroku?
- Greenhouse starts at On request and Heroku at $7/month.
- Does Greenhouse or Heroku run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Heroku is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Heroku cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Both handle Slack.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Grafana Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Neon
- Greenhouse vs DigitalOcean
- Greenhouse vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Greenhouse vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Greenhouse vs Deno Deploy
- Greenhouse vs Hetzner Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Linode
- Greenhouse vs Packer
- Greenhouse vs Pulumi
- Greenhouse vs Render
- Greenhouse vs Upstash
- Greenhouse vs Vagrant
- Greenhouse vs Vultr
- Greenhouse vs Akamai
- Greenhouse vs Alibaba Cloud
- Greenhouse vs Chef
- Greenhouse vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Asana
- Heroku vs ClickUp
- Heroku vs Figma
- Heroku vs Linear
- Heroku vs Monday.com
- Heroku vs Notion
- Heroku vs Amplitude
- Heroku vs Datadog
- Heroku vs PostHog
- Heroku vs PyCharm
- Heroku vs Sketch
- Heroku vs Docker
- Heroku vs Netlify
- Heroku vs Okta
- Heroku vs Aha!
- Heroku vs Coda
- Heroku vs Dashlane
- Heroku vs GitHub
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo


