Software · head to head
AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Okta

AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Software
The leading cloud computing platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AWS (Amazon Web Services) data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AWS (Amazon Web Services) and Okta actually diverge.
| Attribute | AWS (Amazon Web Services) | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli, Mobile | Web, SaaS |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- EC2 - Virtual Servers
- S3 - Object Storage
- RDS - Managed Database
- Lambda - Serverless Computing
- CloudFront - CDN
- VPC - Virtual Network
- IAM - Access Management
- CloudWatch - Monitoring
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
Both cover
- Slack
- SOC2
- ISO27001
- HIPAA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Web hostingnot Okta
- Data storagenot Okta
- Machine learningnot Okta
- Big data analyticsnot Okta
- Application developmentnot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Customer identitynot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- B2B integrationnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zero Trust securitynot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Compliancenot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills
- Discounts require one or three year Savings Plan commitments rather than being automatic
- Every service is priced separately, so a working architecture has no single published cost
- The free tier is a promotional allowance rather than an ongoing free plan
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Free- AWS Free TierFree
- EC2 750 hours/month
- 5GB S3 storage
- 20GB data transfer
- Pay-As-You-GoFree
- No upfront payment
- No long-term commitments
- Pay only for what you use
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose AWS (Amazon Web Services) if
- You need ec2 - virtual servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile.
- You also want s3 - object storage.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Okta?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Okta run on more platforms?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) runs on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use AWS (Amazon Web Services) for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is AWS (Amazon Web Services) best used for?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) is most often used for web hosting, data storage, machine learning, big data analytics. Of those, web hosting and data storage are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can AWS (Amazon Web Services) do that Okta cannot?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, S3 - Object Storage, RDS - Managed Database, Lambda - Serverless Computing. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Both handle Slack, SOC2, ISO27001, HIPAA.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
More on AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Grafana Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Neon
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs DigitalOcean
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Deno Deploy
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Heroku
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Hetzner Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Linode
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Packer
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Pulumi
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Render
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Upstash
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vagrant
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vultr
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Akamai
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Alibaba Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Chef
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Contabo
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Asana
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs ClickUp
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Figma
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Linear
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Monday.com
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Greenhouse
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Notion
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Amplitude
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Datadog
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs PostHog
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs PyCharm
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Sketch
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Docker
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Netlify
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Aha!
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Coda
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Dashlane
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs GitHub
- Okta vs Grafana Cloud
- Okta vs Neon
- Okta vs DigitalOcean
- Okta vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Okta vs Deno Deploy
- Okta vs Heroku
- Okta vs Hetzner Cloud
- Okta vs Linode
- Okta vs Packer
- Okta vs Pulumi
- Okta vs Render
- Okta vs Upstash
- Okta vs Vagrant
- Okta vs Vultr
- Okta vs Akamai
- Okta vs Alibaba Cloud
- Okta vs Chef
- Okta vs Contabo
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub

