Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Neon vs Okta
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- They diverge on capability: Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO).
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neon and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
Both cover
- SOC2
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot Okta
- Development databasesnot Okta
- Preview environmentsnot Okta
- Testingnot Okta
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Neon
- Customer identitynot Neon
- B2B integrationnot Neon
- Zero Trust securitynot Neon
- Compliancenot Neon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Neon or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neon starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neon or Okta?
- Neon starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Neon or Okta run on more platforms?
- Neon runs on Cloud. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neon best used for?
- Neon is most often used for serverless applications, development databases, preview environments, testing. Of those, serverless applications and development databases are not what Okta is typically brought in for.
- What can Neon do that Okta cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory. Both handle SOC2.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceOkta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neon vs Grafana Cloud
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs Deno Deploy
- Neon vs Heroku
- Neon vs Hetzner Cloud
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Packer
- Neon vs Pulumi
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs Vagrant
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Akamai
- Neon vs Alibaba Cloud
- Neon vs Chef
- Neon vs Contabo
- Neon vs Asana
- Neon vs ClickUp
- Neon vs Figma
- Neon vs Linear
- Neon vs Monday.com
- Neon vs Greenhouse
- Neon vs Notion
- Neon vs Amplitude
- Neon vs Datadog
- Neon vs PostHog
- Neon vs PyCharm
- Neon vs Sketch
- Neon vs Docker
- Neon vs Netlify
- Neon vs Aha!
- Neon vs Coda
- Neon vs Dashlane
- Neon vs GitHub
- Okta vs Grafana Cloud
- Okta vs DigitalOcean
- Okta vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Okta vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Okta vs Deno Deploy
- Okta vs Heroku
- Okta vs Hetzner Cloud
- Okta vs Linode
- Okta vs Packer
- Okta vs Pulumi
- Okta vs Render
- Okta vs Upstash
- Okta vs Vagrant
- Okta vs Vultr
- Okta vs Akamai
- Okta vs Alibaba Cloud
- Okta vs Chef
- Okta vs Contabo
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub


