Softwr

Calendar & Time Management · head to head

Harvest Forecast vs Mattermost

Harvest Forecast logo

Harvest Forecast

Calendar & Time Management

Simple visual resource planning

From
$5/month
Rated
-
Mattermost logo

Mattermost

Communication & Collaboration

Channel-centric collaboration for secure workflows

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Harvest Forecast the free plan allows a single seat and 2 projects; Mattermost no prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Harvest Forecast and Mattermost actually diverge.

Attributes where Harvest Forecast and Mattermost differ
AttributeHarvest ForecastMattermost
Starting price$5/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
CategoryCalendar & Time ManagementCommunication & Collaboration
Founded2006Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Harvest Forecast

  • Visual scheduling
  • Capacity planning
  • Project assignments
  • Utilization reports
  • Harvest integration
  • Harvest
  • Google Calendar
  • iCal

Only in Mattermost

Nothing recorded that Harvest Forecast does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Harvest Forecast

  • Time tracking and invoicing against client projectsnot Mattermost
  • Forecasting team capacity and scheduling worknot Mattermost

Mattermost

No use cases recorded yet. See the Mattermost review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Harvest Forecast

  • The free plan allows a single seat and 2 projects
  • Paid plans bill per seat with usage charged beyond the base rate rather than being purely flat
  • The Enterprise plan is $14 per seat per month against $9 on Teams
  • The 20% saving requires annual payment
  • Enterprise Plus is custom priced

Mattermost

  • No prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
  • Professional is capped at a maximum of 250 users, forcing a move to Enterprise for larger teams
  • Licenses are sold only as prepaid annual subscriptions, and organizations that exceed their licensed seat count must purchase additional seats on a prorated quarterly basis

Pricing, plan by plan

Harvest Forecast

$5/month
  • Per seat$5/month
    • Visual planning
    • Harvest integration
    • Team scheduling

Mattermost

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Mattermost review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Harvest Forecast if

  • You need visual scheduling.
  • You also want capacity planning.

Choose Mattermost if

Nothing in the data separates Mattermost from Harvest Forecast on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is Harvest Forecast or Mattermost better?
Neither clearly leads. Harvest Forecast starts at $5/month and Mattermost at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Harvest Forecast or Mattermost?
Harvest Forecast starts at $5/month and Mattermost at On request.
Does Harvest Forecast or Mattermost run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Harvest Forecast best used for?
Harvest Forecast is most often used for time tracking and invoicing against client projects, forecasting team capacity and scheduling work. Of those, time tracking and invoicing against client projects and forecasting team capacity and scheduling work are not what Mattermost is typically brought in for.
What can Harvest Forecast do that Mattermost cannot?
Harvest Forecast covers Visual scheduling, Capacity planning, Project assignments, Utilization reports.

Related pages

Other head to heads