Technology · head to head
Greenhouse vs Moz
The short version
- Only Moz has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Moz smaller keyword database with only 500M+ keywords compared to 25 billion for Semrush
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Moz covers Keyword Explorer.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Moz actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Moz |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web |
| Category | Technology | Marketing |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Moz
- Keyword Explorer
- Link Explorer
- Site Crawl
- Rank Tracking
- Page Optimization
- Competitive research
- Local SEO tools
- Fresh Web Explorer
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Moz
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Moz
Moz
- SEO auditsnot Greenhouse
- Keyword researchnot Greenhouse
- Link buildingnot Greenhouse
- Local SEOnot Greenhouse
- Competitive analysisnot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Moz
- Smaller keyword database with only 500M+ keywords compared to 25 billion for Semrush
- Unreliable competitive analysis for B2B companies with niche competitor sets
- Weekly rank tracking on lower plans creates bottlenecks versus daily updates on competitors
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Moz
Free- Starter$39/month
- Limited keyword tracking
- Basic site audit
- Standard$99/month
- Enhanced keyword tracking
- Competitive analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Moz if
- You need keyword explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want link explorer.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Moz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Moz at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Moz?
- Moz has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Moz.
- Does Greenhouse or Moz run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Moz runs on Web.
- Can I use Moz for free?
- Yes. Moz has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Moz is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Moz cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Moz covers Keyword Explorer, Link Explorer, Site Crawl, Rank Tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Moz: What are Moz's main weaknesses compared to Semrush and Ahrefs?
Moz has a smaller keyword database (500M+ keywords vs Semrush's 25B), weaker competitive analysis tools for B2B niches, weekly rank tracking on lower plans, and limited local SEO features compared to modern competitors.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Wrike
- Greenhouse vs Buffer
- Greenhouse vs Hootsuite
- Greenhouse vs Ahrefs
- Greenhouse vs Customer.io
- Greenhouse vs Instapage
- Greenhouse vs Iterable
- Greenhouse vs Leadpages
- Greenhouse vs Mailgun
- Greenhouse vs MoEngage
- Greenhouse vs Postmark
- Greenhouse vs Typeform
- Greenhouse vs Unbounce
- Greenhouse vs Vimeo
- Moz vs Asana
- Moz vs ClickUp
- Moz vs Figma
- Moz vs Linear
- Moz vs Monday.com
- Moz vs Notion
- Moz vs Amplitude
- Moz vs Datadog
- Moz vs PostHog
- Moz vs PyCharm
- Moz vs Sketch
- Moz vs Docker
- Moz vs Netlify
- Moz vs Okta
- Moz vs Aha!
- Moz vs Coda
- Moz vs Dashlane
- Moz vs GitHub
- Moz vs Wrike
- Moz vs Buffer
- Moz vs Hootsuite
- Moz vs Ahrefs
- Moz vs Customer.io
- Moz vs Instapage
- Moz vs Iterable
- Moz vs Leadpages
- Moz vs Mailgun
- Moz vs MoEngage
- Moz vs Postmark
- Moz vs Typeform
- Moz vs Unbounce
- Moz vs Vimeo


