Database & Data Management · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Mattermost

Amazon Redshift
Database & Data Management
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Mattermost
Communication & Collaboration
Channel-centric collaboration for secure workflows
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Amazon Redshift has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Mattermost no prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Mattermost actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Database & Data Management | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Mattermost
Nothing recorded that Amazon Redshift does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Mattermost
- Data warehousingnot Mattermost
- Real-time analyticsnot Mattermost
- Reportingnot Mattermost
- Machine learningnot Mattermost
Mattermost
No use cases recorded yet. See the Mattermost review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Mattermost
- No prices are published for any of the three paid tiers (Professional, Enterprise, Enterprise Advanced); all require contacting sales
- Professional is capped at a maximum of 250 users, forcing a move to Enterprise for larger teams
- Licenses are sold only as prepaid annual subscriptions, and organizations that exceed their licensed seat count must purchase additional seats on a prorated quarterly basis
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Mattermost
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mattermost review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Mattermost if
Nothing in the data separates Mattermost from Amazon Redshift on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Mattermost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Mattermost at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Mattermost?
- Amazon Redshift has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Amazon Redshift and On request for Mattermost.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Mattermost run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Yes. Amazon Redshift has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mattermost starts at On request.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Mattermost is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Mattermost cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs Zoom
- Amazon Redshift vs Microsoft Teams
- Amazon Redshift vs Loom
- Amazon Redshift vs RingCentral Video
- Amazon Redshift vs Slack
- Amazon Redshift vs Telegram
- Amazon Redshift vs Webex by Cisco
- Amazon Redshift vs Chanty
- Amazon Redshift vs Chatwork
- Amazon Redshift vs Flock
- Amazon Redshift vs Google Chat
- Amazon Redshift vs Grasshopper
- Amazon Redshift vs Lark
- Amazon Redshift vs Quo
- Amazon Redshift vs Rocket.Chat
- Amazon Redshift vs Signal
- Amazon Redshift vs TeamViewer
- Amazon Redshift vs Textline
- Mattermost vs Cockroach Labs
- Mattermost vs PostgreSQL
- Mattermost vs Airtable
- Mattermost vs Amazon Aurora
- Mattermost vs Elasticsearch
- Mattermost vs PlanetScale
- Mattermost vs Azure SQL
- Mattermost vs ClickHouse
- Mattermost vs Couchbase
- Mattermost vs DuckDB
- Mattermost vs DynamoDB
- Mattermost vs MariaDB
- Mattermost vs Oracle Database
- Mattermost vs Amazon RDS
- Mattermost vs Apache Druid
- Mattermost vs Cassandra
- Mattermost vs CouchDB
- Mattermost vs Firebolt
- Mattermost vs Zoom
- Mattermost vs Microsoft Teams
- Mattermost vs Loom
- Mattermost vs RingCentral Video
- Mattermost vs Slack
- Mattermost vs Telegram
- Mattermost vs Webex by Cisco
- Mattermost vs Chanty
- Mattermost vs Chatwork
- Mattermost vs Flock
- Mattermost vs Google Chat
- Mattermost vs Grasshopper
- Mattermost vs Lark
- Mattermost vs Quo
- Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat
- Mattermost vs Signal
- Mattermost vs TeamViewer
- Mattermost vs Textline
