Software · head to head
Wasabi vs Backblaze
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty; Backblaze personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option
- They diverge on capability: Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, Backblaze covers Unlimited backup.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Wasabi and Backblaze actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Only in Backblaze
- Unlimited backup
- Continuous backup
- Version history
- Private encryption key
- Restore by mail
- Mobile apps
- macOS
- Windows
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Backblaze
- Media storagenot Backblaze
- Archive replacementnot Backblaze
- Ransomware protectionnot Backblaze
Backblaze
- Unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drivesnot Wasabi
- Restoring files from anywhere through the webnot Wasabi
- Mailed hard drive restore for large recoveriesnot Wasabi
- Private encryption key control for sensitive datanot Wasabi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Backblaze
- Personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option
- Web restores are capped at 500GB per request
- Forever version history is a Business tier add-on rather than included
- Administrative controls and SSO are Business features
- Backs up user data from a computer and attached drives, so NAS and server backup are not covered by the personal plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Backblaze
$9/month- Personal Backup$9/month
- Unlimited storage for single computer
- Unlimited version history
- 30-day trial
- B2 Cloud Storage$6/TB/month
- S3-compatible storage
- Pay-as-you-go model
Which should you pick?
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Choose Backblaze if
- You need unlimited backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web.
- You also want continuous backup.
Questions people ask
- Is Wasabi or Backblaze better?
- Neither clearly leads. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month and Backblaze at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Wasabi or Backblaze?
- Wasabi starts at $7.99/month and Backblaze at $9/month.
- Does Wasabi or Backblaze run on more platforms?
- Wasabi runs on Web, API. Backblaze runs on Windows, macOS, Web.
- What is Wasabi best used for?
- Wasabi is most often used for backup and recovery, media storage, archive replacement, ransomware protection. Of those, backup and recovery and media storage are not what Backblaze is typically brought in for.
- What can Wasabi do that Backblaze cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Continuous backup, Version history, Private encryption key. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceBackblaze: What is the pricing for Backblaze Personal Backup?
Backblaze Personal Backup costs $9/month on monthly billing or $8.25/month when billed annually, providing unlimited storage for a single computer.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceBackblaze: What storage options does Backblaze B2 offer?
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage is priced at $6/TB per month with a pay-as-you-go model, and is S3 compatible for flexible cloud storage.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceBackblaze: Does Backblaze support Linux systems?
No. Backblaze does not support Linux operating systems, limiting it to Windows, macOS, and web access only.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Deno Deploy
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Pulumi
- Wasabi vs Render
- Wasabi vs Upstash
- Wasabi vs Vagrant
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Akamai
- Wasabi vs Alibaba Cloud
- Wasabi vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Wasabi vs Carbonite
- Wasabi vs Barracuda Backup
- Wasabi vs Arq Backup
- Wasabi vs CrashPlan
- Wasabi vs Duplicati
- Wasabi vs Zerto
- Wasabi vs Box
- Wasabi vs IDrive
- Wasabi vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Wasabi vs Nextcloud
- Wasabi vs pCloud
- Wasabi vs Sync.com
- Wasabi vs Tresorit
- Wasabi vs TrueNAS
- Wasabi vs Veritas NetBackup
- Backblaze vs Grafana Cloud
- Backblaze vs Neon
- Backblaze vs DigitalOcean
- Backblaze vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Backblaze vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Backblaze vs Deno Deploy
- Backblaze vs Heroku
- Backblaze vs Hetzner Cloud
- Backblaze vs Linode
- Backblaze vs Packer
- Backblaze vs Pulumi
- Backblaze vs Render
- Backblaze vs Upstash
- Backblaze vs Vagrant
- Backblaze vs Vultr
- Backblaze vs Akamai
- Backblaze vs Alibaba Cloud
- Backblaze vs Chef
- Backblaze vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Backblaze vs Carbonite
- Backblaze vs Barracuda Backup
- Backblaze vs Arq Backup
- Backblaze vs CrashPlan
- Backblaze vs Duplicati
- Backblaze vs Zerto
- Backblaze vs Box
- Backblaze vs IDrive
- Backblaze vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Backblaze vs Nextcloud
- Backblaze vs pCloud
- Backblaze vs Sync.com
- Backblaze vs Tresorit
- Backblaze vs TrueNAS
- Backblaze vs Veritas NetBackup


