Software · head to head
Backblaze vs Neon
The short version
- Only Neon has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Backblaze personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option; Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- They diverge on capability: Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backblaze and Neon actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backblaze
- Unlimited backup
- Continuous backup
- Version history
- Private encryption key
- Restore by mail
- Mobile apps
- macOS
- Windows
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backblaze
- Unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drivesnot Neon
- Restoring files from anywhere through the webnot Neon
- Mailed hard drive restore for large recoveriesnot Neon
- Private encryption key control for sensitive datanot Neon
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot Backblaze
- Development databasesnot Backblaze
- Preview environmentsnot Backblaze
- Testingnot Backblaze
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backblaze
- Personal Backup is $99 a year billed annually, with no monthly option
- Web restores are capped at 500GB per request
- Forever version history is a Business tier add-on rather than included
- Administrative controls and SSO are Business features
- Backs up user data from a computer and attached drives, so NAS and server backup are not covered by the personal plan
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
Pricing, plan by plan
Backblaze
$9/month- Personal Backup$9/month
- Unlimited storage for single computer
- Unlimited version history
- 30-day trial
- B2 Cloud Storage$6/TB/month
- S3-compatible storage
- Pay-as-you-go model
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
Which should you pick?
Choose Backblaze if
- You need unlimited backup.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web.
- You also want continuous backup.
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Questions people ask
- Is Backblaze or Neon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backblaze starts at $9/month and Neon at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backblaze or Neon?
- Neon has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Backblaze and Free for Neon.
- Does Backblaze or Neon run on more platforms?
- Backblaze runs on Windows, macOS, Web. Neon runs on Cloud.
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Yes. Neon has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Backblaze starts at $9/month.
- What is Backblaze best used for?
- Backblaze is most often used for unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives, restoring files from anywhere through the web, mailed hard drive restore for large recoveries, private encryption key control for sensitive data. Of those, unlimited backup of a personal computer and external drives and restoring files from anywhere through the web are not what Neon is typically brought in for.
- What can Backblaze do that Neon cannot?
- Backblaze covers Unlimited backup, Continuous backup, Version history, Private encryption key. Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backblaze: What is the pricing for Backblaze Personal Backup?
Backblaze Personal Backup costs $9/month on monthly billing or $8.25/month when billed annually, providing unlimited storage for a single computer.
SourceNeon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceBackblaze: What storage options does Backblaze B2 offer?
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage is priced at $6/TB per month with a pay-as-you-go model, and is S3 compatible for flexible cloud storage.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceBackblaze: Does Backblaze support Linux systems?
No. Backblaze does not support Linux operating systems, limiting it to Windows, macOS, and web access only.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Backblaze vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Backblaze vs Carbonite
- Backblaze vs Barracuda Backup
- Backblaze vs Arq Backup
- Backblaze vs CrashPlan
- Backblaze vs Duplicati
- Backblaze vs Zerto
- Backblaze vs Box
- Backblaze vs IDrive
- Backblaze vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Backblaze vs Nextcloud
- Backblaze vs pCloud
- Backblaze vs Sync.com
- Backblaze vs Tresorit
- Backblaze vs TrueNAS
- Backblaze vs Veritas NetBackup
- Backblaze vs Grafana Cloud
- Backblaze vs DigitalOcean
- Backblaze vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Backblaze vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Backblaze vs Deno Deploy
- Backblaze vs Heroku
- Backblaze vs Hetzner Cloud
- Backblaze vs Linode
- Backblaze vs Packer
- Backblaze vs Pulumi
- Backblaze vs Render
- Backblaze vs Upstash
- Backblaze vs Vagrant
- Backblaze vs Vultr
- Backblaze vs Akamai
- Backblaze vs Alibaba Cloud
- Backblaze vs Chef
- Backblaze vs Contabo
- Neon vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Neon vs Carbonite
- Neon vs Barracuda Backup
- Neon vs Arq Backup
- Neon vs CrashPlan
- Neon vs Duplicati
- Neon vs Zerto
- Neon vs Box
- Neon vs IDrive
- Neon vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Neon vs Nextcloud
- Neon vs pCloud
- Neon vs Sync.com
- Neon vs Tresorit
- Neon vs TrueNAS
- Neon vs Veritas NetBackup
- Neon vs Grafana Cloud
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs Deno Deploy
- Neon vs Heroku
- Neon vs Hetzner Cloud
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Packer
- Neon vs Pulumi
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs Vagrant
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Akamai
- Neon vs Alibaba Cloud
- Neon vs Chef
- Neon vs Contabo


