Databases · head to head
Ninox vs ScyllaDB

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ninox and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that ScyllaDB does not also cover.
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot ScyllaDB
- Workflow automation and process managementnot ScyllaDB
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Ninox
- Content managementnot Ninox
- User profilesnot Ninox
- Mobile backendsnot Ninox
- Cachingnot Ninox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Ninox or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ninox or ScyllaDB?
- Ninox starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Ninox or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Ninox runs on Web. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ninox best used for?
- Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Ninox do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs Couchbase
- Ninox vs DataStax
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs RavenDB
- Ninox vs DataGrip
- Ninox vs turbopuffer
- Ninox vs VerneMQ
- Ninox vs Vespa
- Ninox vs Xata
- Ninox vs YugabyteDB
- Ninox vs Zilliz
- Ninox vs DynamoDB
- Ninox vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Airflow
- ScyllaDB vs Knack
- ScyllaDB vs FaunaDB
- ScyllaDB vs Readyset
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs RabbitMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Memcached
- ScyllaDB vs MotherDuck
- ScyllaDB vs Neo4j
- ScyllaDB vs OpenSearch
- ScyllaDB vs Qdrant
- ScyllaDB vs SingleStore
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Kafka
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB

