Databases · head to head
ClickHouse vs ScyllaDB

ClickHouse
Databases
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClickHouse limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClickHouse and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClickHouse | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | usage-based |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker) | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClickHouse
- Column-oriented Storage
- Real-time Analytics
- SQL Support
- Linear Scalability
- Data Compression
- Vectorized Query Execution
- Approximate Calculations
- S3
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Kafka
- Linux support
- Docker support
- Kubernetes support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClickHouse
- Business intelligencenot ScyllaDB
- Data warehousingnot ScyllaDB
- Real-time analyticsnot ScyllaDB
- Reportingnot ScyllaDB
- Machine learningnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot ClickHouse
- Content managementnot ClickHouse
- User profilesnot ClickHouse
- Mobile backendsnot ClickHouse
- Cachingnot ClickHouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClickHouse
- Limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems
- Requires upfront schema design discipline with MergeTree engine choices and sort/partition keys
- Experimental vector search support, not production-ready for vector operations
- Different query syntax from standard SQL requiring migration planning
- Limited JOIN capabilities compared to traditional relational databases
- Migration complexity with 2-4 weeks estimated for data type mapping and query translation
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
ClickHouse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ClickHouse review.
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose ClickHouse if
- You need column-oriented storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker).
- You also want real-time analytics.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is ClickHouse or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClickHouse starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClickHouse or ScyllaDB?
- ClickHouse starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does ClickHouse or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- ClickHouse runs on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker). ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use ClickHouse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClickHouse best used for?
- ClickHouse is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can ClickHouse do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Real-time Analytics, SQL Support, Linear Scalability. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Kafka, Linux support, Docker support, Kubernetes support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClickHouse: What is ClickHouse best used for?
ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads on large datasets. It excels at fast aggregations and queries, being 10-100x faster than PostgreSQL on large aggregations.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceClickHouse: Does ClickHouse support transactions?
ClickHouse has limited transaction support and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations. It is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strict ACID guarantees.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceClickHouse: How does ClickHouse compare to PostgreSQL?
ClickHouse is 10-100x faster for analytics but PostgreSQL is better for transactional workloads. Many teams use both: PostgreSQL for writes via MaterializedPostgreSQL replication to ClickHouse for analytics.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ClickHouse vs Apache Druid
- ClickHouse vs SingleStore
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
- ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
- ClickHouse vs Tinybird
- ClickHouse vs Timeplus
- ClickHouse vs StarRocks
- ClickHouse vs Presto
- ClickHouse vs DuckDB
- ClickHouse vs Valkey
- ClickHouse vs ArangoDB
- ClickHouse vs Canary Labs
- ClickHouse vs Chroma
- ClickHouse vs Apache Pinot
- ClickHouse vs Apache Doris
- ClickHouse vs Cassandra
- ClickHouse vs Apache Solr
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Aurora
- ClickHouse vs Airtable
- ClickHouse vs Cockroach Labs
- ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse vs Couchbase
- ClickHouse vs DataStax
- ClickHouse vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ClickHouse vs RavenDB
- ClickHouse vs DataGrip
- ClickHouse vs turbopuffer
- ClickHouse vs VerneMQ
- ClickHouse vs Vespa
- ClickHouse vs Xata
- ClickHouse vs YugabyteDB
- ClickHouse vs Zilliz
- ClickHouse vs DynamoDB
- ClickHouse vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Druid
- ScyllaDB vs SingleStore
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- ScyllaDB vs TimescaleDB
- ScyllaDB vs Tinybird
- ScyllaDB vs Timeplus
- ScyllaDB vs StarRocks
- ScyllaDB vs Presto
- ScyllaDB vs DuckDB
- ScyllaDB vs Valkey
- ScyllaDB vs ArangoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Canary Labs
- ScyllaDB vs Chroma
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Pinot
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Doris
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Solr
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
