Software · head to head
Harvest vs Tana

Harvest
Software
Time tracking software for teams that care about where their time goes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Harvest the free plan is one seat and two projects, so it suits a solo freelancer and nothing larger; Tana the free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- They diverge on capability: Harvest covers Time tracking, Tana covers Outliner interface.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Harvest and Tana actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Harvest
- Time tracking
- Expense tracking
- Invoicing
- Project budgets
- Team capacity
- Detailed reports
- Mobile apps
- Browser extension
Only in Tana
- Outliner interface
- Supertags
- Live queries
- AI integration
- Graph views
- Email capture
- API
- Zapier
Both cover
- 2FA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Harvest
- Time tracking against projects and clientsnot Tana
- Turning tracked time into invoicesnot Tana
- Expense capture alongside billable hoursnot Tana
- Team capacity and utilisation reporting on the paid plansnot Tana
- Feeding billed time into QuickBooks or Xeronot Tana
Tana
- Structured note taking with a graph based supertag data modelnot Harvest
- Automatic meeting capture with AI transcripts and summariesnot Harvest
- Turning notes into queryable structured databasesnot Harvest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Harvest
- The free plan is one seat and two projects, so it suits a solo freelancer and nothing larger
- Team reporting and unlimited projects require the Teams plan at $9 per seat per month
- Profitability reporting, timesheet approvals and custom reports need Enterprise at $14 per seat per month
- SAML single sign-on is Enterprise only
- QuickBooks, Xero and Stripe integrations are withheld from the free plan
Tana
- The free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- The free plan connects only 1 calendar and allows 50 AI queries
- Pro is $30 per user per month at standard price, with $20 shown as an early bird rate
- Max is $120 per user per month at standard price, with $80 shown as an early bird rate
- Integrations and full MCP require the Pro plan
- Dedicated support and onboarding, and unlimited agents, skills and types, require the Max plan
- The Business plan is custom priced, billed yearly and has no published rate
- The free trial runs 30 days
Pricing, plan by plan
Harvest
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Harvest review.
Tana
Free- FreeFree
- Core features
- Supertags
- Searches
- Pro$10/month
- Advanced AI
- Priority support
- Extended history
Which should you pick?
Choose Harvest if
- You need time tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want expense tracking.
Choose Tana if
- You need outliner interface.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want supertags.
Questions people ask
- Is Harvest or Tana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Harvest starts at Free and Tana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Harvest or Tana?
- Harvest starts at Free and Tana at Free.
- Does Harvest or Tana run on more platforms?
- Harvest runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Tana runs on Web, Desktop.
- Can I use Harvest for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Harvest best used for?
- Harvest is most often used for time tracking against projects and clients, turning tracked time into invoices, expense capture alongside billable hours, team capacity and utilisation reporting on the paid plans. Of those, time tracking against projects and clients and turning tracked time into invoices are not what Tana is typically brought in for.
- What can Harvest do that Tana cannot?
- Harvest covers Time tracking, Expense tracking, Invoicing, Project budgets. Tana covers Outliner interface, Supertags, Live queries, AI integration. Both handle 2FA.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Harvest vs Toggl Track
- Harvest vs Avaza
- Harvest vs BigTime
- Harvest vs Function Point
- Harvest vs Todoist
- Harvest vs Things 3
- Harvest vs OmniFocus 3
- Harvest vs Brain.fm
- Harvest vs TickTick
- Harvest vs Akiflow
- Harvest vs Any.do
- Harvest vs Focus@Will
- Harvest vs Forest
- Harvest vs Google Workspace
- Harvest vs Hubstaff
- Harvest vs Remember The Milk
- Harvest vs Structured
- Harvest vs Time Doctor
- Harvest vs 7-Zip
- Harvest vs Bear
- Harvest vs Bear Notes
- Harvest vs BoldSign
- Tana vs Toggl Track
- Tana vs Avaza
- Tana vs BigTime
- Tana vs Function Point
- Tana vs Todoist
- Tana vs Things 3
- Tana vs OmniFocus 3
- Tana vs Brain.fm
- Tana vs TickTick
- Tana vs Akiflow
- Tana vs Any.do
- Tana vs Focus@Will
- Tana vs Forest
- Tana vs Google Workspace
- Tana vs Hubstaff
- Tana vs Remember The Milk
- Tana vs Structured
- Tana vs Time Doctor
- Tana vs 7-Zip
- Tana vs Bear
- Tana vs Bear Notes
- Tana vs BoldSign

