Software · head to head
Greenhouse vs June
The short version
- Only June has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; June the pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, June covers B2B analytics.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and June actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | June |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in June
- B2B analytics
- Account tracking
- Cohort analysis
- Dashboards
- Segment
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- English language support
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot June
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot June
June
- Company-level product analytics for B2B SaaSnot Greenhouse
- Spotting churn risk from account usage patternsnot Greenhouse
- Pushing product usage data into Salesforce, HubSpot or Attionot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
June
- The pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver
- There is no startup plan; the vendor states June is a fit for companies with at least $1M of ARR
- Setup fees are charged separately and the vendor states they vary based on implementation complexity
- The vendor states June is a poor fit for products with a large user base but low revenue per user
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
June
Free- FreeFree
- Basic analytics
- 1 user
- 30 days retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose June if
- You need b2b analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want account tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or June better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and June at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or June?
- June has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for June.
- Does Greenhouse or June run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. June runs on Web.
- Can I use June for free?
- Yes. June has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what June is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that June cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. June covers B2B analytics, Account tracking, Cohort analysis, Dashboards. Both handle Slack, GDPR.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Crazy Egg
- Greenhouse vs Ruler Analytics
- Greenhouse vs Northbeam
- Greenhouse vs VWO
- Greenhouse vs Attribution
- Greenhouse vs Countly
- Greenhouse vs Dreamdata
- Greenhouse vs Google Analytics
- Greenhouse vs Triple Whale
- Greenhouse vs AB Tasty
- Greenhouse vs Adobe Analytics
- Greenhouse vs Adverity
- Greenhouse vs Convert
- Greenhouse vs Datorama
- Greenhouse vs Fathom Analytics
- Greenhouse vs Funnel.io
- Greenhouse vs Google Optimize
- Greenhouse vs Improvado
- June vs Asana
- June vs ClickUp
- June vs Figma
- June vs Linear
- June vs Monday.com
- June vs Notion
- June vs Amplitude
- June vs Datadog
- June vs PostHog
- June vs PyCharm
- June vs Sketch
- June vs Docker
- June vs Netlify
- June vs Okta
- June vs Aha!
- June vs Coda
- June vs Dashlane
- June vs GitHub
- June vs Crazy Egg
- June vs Ruler Analytics
- June vs Northbeam
- June vs VWO
- June vs Attribution
- June vs Countly
- June vs Dreamdata
- June vs Google Analytics
- June vs Triple Whale
- June vs AB Tasty
- June vs Adobe Analytics
- June vs Adverity
- June vs Convert
- June vs Datorama
- June vs Fathom Analytics
- June vs Funnel.io
- June vs Google Optimize
- June vs Improvado


