Software · head to head
June vs Linear
The short version
- Each has a real cost: June the pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- They diverge on capability: June covers B2B analytics, Linear covers Fast, real-time sync.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which June and Linear actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in June
- B2B analytics
- Account tracking
- Cohort analysis
- Dashboards
- Segment
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- English language support
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
June
- Company-level product analytics for B2B SaaSnot Linear
- Spotting churn risk from account usage patternsnot Linear
- Pushing product usage data into Salesforce, HubSpot or Attionot Linear
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot June
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot June
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot June
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot June
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot June
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
June
- The pricing page lists a single all-in-one plan with no price, no minimum and no named cost driver
- There is no startup plan; the vendor states June is a fit for companies with at least $1M of ARR
- Setup fees are charged separately and the vendor states they vary based on implementation complexity
- The vendor states June is a poor fit for products with a large user base but low revenue per user
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
June
Free- FreeFree
- Basic analytics
- 1 user
- 30 days retention
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose June if
- You need b2b analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want account tracking.
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is June or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. June starts at Free and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, June or Linear?
- June starts at Free and Linear at Free.
- Does June or Linear run on more platforms?
- June runs on Web. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use June for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is June best used for?
- June is most often used for company-level product analytics for b2b saas, spotting churn risk from account usage patterns, pushing product usage data into salesforce, hubspot or attio. Of those, company-level product analytics for b2b saas and spotting churn risk from account usage patterns are not what Linear is typically brought in for.
- What can June do that Linear cannot?
- June covers B2B analytics, Account tracking, Cohort analysis, Dashboards. Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints). Both handle Slack, GDPR.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- June vs Crazy Egg
- June vs Ruler Analytics
- June vs Northbeam
- June vs VWO
- June vs Attribution
- June vs Countly
- June vs Dreamdata
- June vs Google Analytics
- June vs Triple Whale
- June vs AB Tasty
- June vs Adobe Analytics
- June vs Adverity
- June vs Convert
- June vs Datorama
- June vs Fathom Analytics
- June vs Funnel.io
- June vs Google Optimize
- June vs Improvado
- June vs Asana
- June vs ClickUp
- June vs Figma
- June vs Monday.com
- June vs Greenhouse
- June vs Notion
- June vs Amplitude
- June vs Datadog
- June vs PostHog
- June vs PyCharm
- June vs Sketch
- June vs Docker
- June vs Netlify
- June vs Okta
- June vs Aha!
- June vs Coda
- June vs Dashlane
- June vs GitHub
- Linear vs Crazy Egg
- Linear vs Ruler Analytics
- Linear vs Northbeam
- Linear vs VWO
- Linear vs Attribution
- Linear vs Countly
- Linear vs Dreamdata
- Linear vs Google Analytics
- Linear vs Triple Whale
- Linear vs AB Tasty
- Linear vs Adobe Analytics
- Linear vs Adverity
- Linear vs Convert
- Linear vs Datorama
- Linear vs Fathom Analytics
- Linear vs Funnel.io
- Linear vs Google Optimize
- Linear vs Improvado
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Amplitude
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs PyCharm
- Linear vs Sketch
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Netlify
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs Aha!
- Linear vs Coda
- Linear vs Dashlane
- Linear vs GitHub


