Software · head to head
Google Maps Platform vs Sea Machines

Google Maps Platform
Software
Comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed Google
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Google Maps Platform free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete; Sea Machines requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
- They diverge on capability: Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality, Sea Machines covers Autonomous control.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Maps Platform and Sea Machines actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Maps Platform | Sea Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $50000/one-time |
| Pricing model | freemium | one-time |
| Platforms | Web | Embedded, Web, Mobile |
| Founded | 2005 | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Maps Platform
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in Sea Machines
- Autonomous control
- Remote operation
- Collision avoidance
- Pattern following
- Vessel systems
- Communication networks
- Shore-based control
- Embedded support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Maps Platform
- Embedding dynamic maps, Street View and photorealistic 3D tiles in an applicationnot Sea Machines
- Route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisationnot Sea Machines
- Geocoding, place autocomplete and address validationnot Sea Machines
- Environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollennot Sea Machines
- Geospatial analytics through Earth Enginenot Sea Machines
Sea Machines
- Intelligent voyage and transit autonomy for workboatsnot Google Maps Platform
- Pattern autonomy for survey and repetitive route worknot Google Maps Platform
- Collision avoidance using the AI-ris computer vision sensornot Google Maps Platform
- Remote command and control of vessels, including in GPS denied environmentsnot Google Maps Platform
- Fleet management and telemetry through Fleetviewer and the SMLINK APIsnot Google Maps Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Maps Platform
- Free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete
- Dynamic Maps cost $7.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
- Geocoding and the Directions API both cost $5.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
- Pricing is tiered by volume, so the effective unit price depends on total monthly usage and is hard to predict in advance
- Billing is usage based with no flat plan, so a traffic spike is a cost spike
Sea Machines
- Requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
- Targeted at vessels from 10 to 300 ft, so it does not address the largest commercial tonnage
- Pricing is not published and is arranged directly with the vendor
- The SM300-NG is the class-approved unit, so the cheaper SM300-SP does not carry the same approval
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Maps Platform
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Google Maps Platform review.
Sea Machines
$50000/one-time- SM300$75000/one-time
- Autonomous control
- Collision avoidance
- Remote operation
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Maps Platform if
- You need core functionality.
- You also want user interface.
Choose Sea Machines if
- You need autonomous control.
- You work on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
- You also want remote operation.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Maps Platform or Sea Machines better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Maps Platform starts at On request and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Maps Platform or Sea Machines?
- Google Maps Platform starts at On request and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time.
- Does Google Maps Platform or Sea Machines run on more platforms?
- Google Maps Platform runs on Web. Sea Machines runs on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
- What is Google Maps Platform best used for?
- Google Maps Platform is most often used for embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application, route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation, geocoding, place autocomplete and address validation, environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollen. Of those, embedding dynamic maps, street view and photorealistic 3d tiles in an application and route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisation are not what Sea Machines is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Maps Platform do that Sea Machines cannot?
- Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Sea Machines covers Autonomous control, Remote operation, Collision avoidance, Pattern following.
Related pages
More on Google Maps Platform
More on Sea Machines
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Google Maps Platform vs Mapbox
- Google Maps Platform vs HERE Technologies
- Google Maps Platform vs Apple Maps
- Google Maps Platform vs Leaflet
- Google Maps Platform vs Esri ArcGIS
- Google Maps Platform vs CesiumJS
- Google Maps Platform vs Samsara
- Google Maps Platform vs Bing Maps
- Google Maps Platform vs CARTO
- Google Maps Platform vs Geotab
- Google Maps Platform vs GraphHopper
- Google Maps Platform vs HERE WeGo
- Google Maps Platform vs IndoorAtlas
- Google Maps Platform vs Mappedin
- Google Maps Platform vs Verizon Connect
- Google Maps Platform vs AllTrails
- Google Maps Platform vs Citymapper
- Google Maps Platform vs deck.gl
- Google Maps Platform vs MarineTraffic
- Google Maps Platform vs ChartCo
- Google Maps Platform vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Google Maps Platform vs Veson Nautical
- Google Maps Platform vs Wartsila Voyage
- Google Maps Platform vs Windward
- Google Maps Platform vs Dataloy
- Google Maps Platform vs DNV Maritime
- Google Maps Platform vs exactEarth
- Google Maps Platform vs FourKites
- Google Maps Platform vs Freightos
- Google Maps Platform vs INTTRA
- Google Maps Platform vs Kpler
- Google Maps Platform vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- Google Maps Platform vs NAPA
- Google Maps Platform vs Nautilus Labs
- Google Maps Platform vs Navis N4
- Google Maps Platform vs NAVTOR
- Sea Machines vs Mapbox
- Sea Machines vs HERE Technologies
- Sea Machines vs Apple Maps
- Sea Machines vs Leaflet
- Sea Machines vs Esri ArcGIS
- Sea Machines vs CesiumJS
- Sea Machines vs Samsara
- Sea Machines vs Bing Maps
- Sea Machines vs CARTO
- Sea Machines vs Geotab
- Sea Machines vs GraphHopper
- Sea Machines vs HERE WeGo
- Sea Machines vs IndoorAtlas
- Sea Machines vs Mappedin
- Sea Machines vs Verizon Connect
- Sea Machines vs AllTrails
- Sea Machines vs Citymapper
- Sea Machines vs deck.gl
- Sea Machines vs MarineTraffic
- Sea Machines vs ChartCo
- Sea Machines vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Sea Machines vs Veson Nautical
- Sea Machines vs Wartsila Voyage
- Sea Machines vs Windward
- Sea Machines vs Dataloy
- Sea Machines vs DNV Maritime
- Sea Machines vs exactEarth
- Sea Machines vs FourKites
- Sea Machines vs Freightos
- Sea Machines vs INTTRA
- Sea Machines vs Kpler
- Sea Machines vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- Sea Machines vs NAPA
- Sea Machines vs Nautilus Labs
- Sea Machines vs Navis N4
- Sea Machines vs NAVTOR

