Softwr

Software · head to head

FourKites vs Google Maps Platform

FourKites logo

FourKites

Software

Real-time supply chain visibility

From
$2000/month
Rated
-
Google Maps Platform logo

Google Maps Platform

Software

Comprehensive set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to embed Google

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: FourKites fourKites uses an Outcome-as-a-Service model with no per-seat pricing published; all pricing requires talking to an Outcome Advisor; Google Maps Platform free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete
  • They diverge on capability: FourKites covers Real-time tracking, Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which FourKites and Google Maps Platform actually diverge.

Attributes where FourKites and Google Maps Platform differ
AttributeFourKitesGoogle Maps Platform
Starting price$2000/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionfreemium
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb
Founded20142005

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in FourKites

  • Real-time tracking
  • Predictive ETAs
  • Exception alerts
  • Yard management
  • TMS platforms
  • ERP systems
  • WMS
  • Web support

Only in Google Maps Platform

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

FourKites

No use cases recorded yet. See the FourKites review.

Google Maps Platform

  • Embedding dynamic maps, Street View and photorealistic 3D tiles in an applicationnot FourKites
  • Route computation, navigation and fleet route optimisationnot FourKites
  • Geocoding, place autocomplete and address validationnot FourKites
  • Environmental data including weather, solar, air quality and pollennot FourKites
  • Geospatial analytics through Earth Enginenot FourKites

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

FourKites

  • FourKites uses an Outcome-as-a-Service model with no per-seat pricing published; all pricing requires talking to an Outcome Advisor

Google Maps Platform

  • Free allowances are per service rather than pooled, at 10,000 events a month for dynamic maps, geocoding and autocomplete
  • Dynamic Maps cost $7.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
  • Geocoding and the Directions API both cost $5.00 per 1,000 calls at the entry tier
  • Pricing is tiered by volume, so the effective unit price depends on total monthly usage and is hard to predict in advance
  • Billing is usage based with no flat plan, so a traffic spike is a cost spike

Pricing, plan by plan

FourKites

$2000/month
  • Professional$5000/month
    • Multi-modal tracking
    • Predictive ETAs
    • Analytics

Google Maps Platform

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Google Maps Platform review.

Which should you pick?

Choose FourKites if

  • You need real-time tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want predictive etas.

Choose Google Maps Platform if

  • You need core functionality.
  • You also want user interface.

Questions people ask

Is FourKites or Google Maps Platform better?
Neither clearly leads. FourKites starts at $2000/month and Google Maps Platform at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, FourKites or Google Maps Platform?
FourKites starts at $2000/month and Google Maps Platform at On request.
Does FourKites or Google Maps Platform run on more platforms?
FourKites runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Google Maps Platform runs on Web.
What can FourKites do that Google Maps Platform cannot?
FourKites covers Real-time tracking, Predictive ETAs, Exception alerts, Yard management. Google Maps Platform covers Core Functionality, User Interface.

Related pages

Other head to heads