Software · head to head
CARTO vs FourKites
The short version
- Only CARTO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CARTO no prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only; FourKites fourKites uses an Outcome-as-a-Service model with no per-seat pricing published; all pricing requires talking to an Outcome Advisor
- They diverge on capability: CARTO covers Spatial Analysis, FourKites covers Real-time tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CARTO and FourKites actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CARTO
- Spatial Analysis
- Interactive Maps
- Data Observatory
- Workflows
- APIs
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- PostgreSQL
Only in FourKites
- Real-time tracking
- Predictive ETAs
- Exception alerts
- Yard management
- TMS platforms
- ERP systems
- WMS
- Ios support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CARTO
- Spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehousenot FourKites
- Building interactive maps and location dashboardsnot FourKites
- Geocoding and routing through location data servicesnot FourKites
- Site selection and territory planningnot FourKites
- Self-hosted geospatial analytics for regulated environmentsnot FourKites
FourKites
No use cases recorded yet. See the FourKites review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CARTO
- No prices are published; the committed tiers are all quote-only
- Metered on four separate axes: workflow runs, map loads, API calls and location data service operations
- API access and tokens are limited on pay-as-you-go and unlimited only from the Strategic tier
- Self-hosting is available on Enterprise and included only on the Custom tier
- The 14 day trial explicitly forbids production use
FourKites
- FourKites uses an Outcome-as-a-Service model with no per-seat pricing published; all pricing requires talking to an Outcome Advisor
Pricing, plan by plan
CARTO
Free- Professional$199/month
- Spatial Analysis
- Data Observatory
- Builder
FourKites
$2000/month- Professional$5000/month
- Multi-modal tracking
- Predictive ETAs
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose CARTO if
- You need spatial analysis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want interactive maps.
Choose FourKites if
- You need real-time tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want predictive etas.
Questions people ask
- Is CARTO or FourKites better?
- Neither clearly leads. CARTO starts at Free and FourKites at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CARTO or FourKites?
- CARTO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CARTO and $2000/month for FourKites.
- Does CARTO or FourKites run on more platforms?
- CARTO runs on Web. FourKites runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- Can I use CARTO for free?
- Yes. CARTO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. FourKites starts at $2000/month.
- What is CARTO best used for?
- CARTO is most often used for spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehouse, building interactive maps and location dashboards, geocoding and routing through location data services, site selection and territory planning. Of those, spatial analysis over data already in a cloud warehouse and building interactive maps and location dashboards are not what FourKites is typically brought in for.
- What can CARTO do that FourKites cannot?
- CARTO covers Spatial Analysis, Interactive Maps, Data Observatory, Workflows. FourKites covers Real-time tracking, Predictive ETAs, Exception alerts, Yard management. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CARTO vs Mapbox
- CARTO vs Google Maps Platform
- CARTO vs HERE Technologies
- CARTO vs Apple Maps
- CARTO vs Leaflet
- CARTO vs Esri ArcGIS
- CARTO vs CesiumJS
- CARTO vs Samsara
- CARTO vs Bing Maps
- CARTO vs Geotab
- CARTO vs GraphHopper
- CARTO vs HERE WeGo
- CARTO vs IndoorAtlas
- CARTO vs Mappedin
- CARTO vs Verizon Connect
- CARTO vs AllTrails
- CARTO vs Citymapper
- CARTO vs deck.gl
- CARTO vs MarineTraffic
- CARTO vs ChartCo
- CARTO vs Kongsberg Maritime
- CARTO vs Sea Machines
- CARTO vs Veson Nautical
- CARTO vs Wartsila Voyage
- CARTO vs Windward
- CARTO vs Dataloy
- CARTO vs DNV Maritime
- CARTO vs exactEarth
- CARTO vs Freightos
- CARTO vs INTTRA
- CARTO vs Kpler
- CARTO vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- CARTO vs NAPA
- CARTO vs Nautilus Labs
- CARTO vs Navis N4
- CARTO vs NAVTOR
- FourKites vs Mapbox
- FourKites vs Google Maps Platform
- FourKites vs HERE Technologies
- FourKites vs Apple Maps
- FourKites vs Leaflet
- FourKites vs Esri ArcGIS
- FourKites vs CesiumJS
- FourKites vs Samsara
- FourKites vs Bing Maps
- FourKites vs Geotab
- FourKites vs GraphHopper
- FourKites vs HERE WeGo
- FourKites vs IndoorAtlas
- FourKites vs Mappedin
- FourKites vs Verizon Connect
- FourKites vs AllTrails
- FourKites vs Citymapper
- FourKites vs deck.gl
- FourKites vs MarineTraffic
- FourKites vs ChartCo
- FourKites vs Kongsberg Maritime
- FourKites vs Sea Machines
- FourKites vs Veson Nautical
- FourKites vs Wartsila Voyage
- FourKites vs Windward
- FourKites vs Dataloy
- FourKites vs DNV Maritime
- FourKites vs exactEarth
- FourKites vs Freightos
- FourKites vs INTTRA
- FourKites vs Kpler
- FourKites vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- FourKites vs NAPA
- FourKites vs Nautilus Labs
- FourKites vs Navis N4
- FourKites vs NAVTOR

