Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Quo

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Quo logo

Quo

Software

Formerly OpenPhone

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Quo unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Quo actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Quo differ
AttributeAssistant.toQuo
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Quo

Nothing recorded that Assistant.to does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Quo
  • Appointment bookingnot Quo
  • Time trackingnot Quo
  • Resource managementnot Quo
  • Team coordinationnot Quo

Quo

No use cases recorded yet. See the Quo review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Quo

  • Unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
  • Starter tier's $15/user annual rate requires prepaying annually; monthly billing costs $19/user, about 27% more
  • The Sona AI agent automation credits are capped at 1,000 free per plan before additional usage is billed

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Quo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Quo review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Quo if

  • You want to start without paying.
Quo review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Quo better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Quo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Quo?
Assistant.to starts at Free and Quo at Free.
Does Assistant.to or Quo run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Quo runs on Web.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Quo is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Quo cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Quo

Keep looking

Other head to heads