Software · head to head
Assistant.to vs Grasshopper
The short version
- Only Assistant.to has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Grasshopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Assistant.to | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Chrome-extension | Web |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assistant.to
- In-email scheduling
- One-click booking
- Google Calendar sync
- Time zone handling
- Simple interface
- Gmail
- Google Calendar
- Chrome-extension support
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that Assistant.to does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assistant.to
- Schedulingnot Grasshopper
- Appointment bookingnot Grasshopper
- Time trackingnot Grasshopper
- Resource managementnot Grasshopper
- Team coordinationnot Grasshopper
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assistant.to
- No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
- Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Assistant.to
Free- FreeFree
- In-email scheduling
- Basic features
- Pro$5/month
- Team features
- Custom branding
- Priority support
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Assistant.to if
- You need in-email scheduling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome-extension.
- You also want one-click booking.
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from Assistant.to on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Assistant.to or Grasshopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Grasshopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Grasshopper?
- Assistant.to has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Assistant.to and On request for Grasshopper.
- Does Assistant.to or Grasshopper run on more platforms?
- Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Grasshopper runs on Web.
- Can I use Assistant.to for free?
- Yes. Assistant.to has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Grasshopper starts at On request.
- What is Assistant.to best used for?
- Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Grasshopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Assistant.to do that Grasshopper cannot?
- Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling.
Related pages
More on Assistant.to
More on Grasshopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Assistant.to vs Google Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Apple Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Fantastical
- Assistant.to vs Clockify
- Assistant.to vs Microsoft To Do
- Assistant.to vs OmniFocus
- Assistant.to vs Amie
- Assistant.to vs Outlook Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Float
- Assistant.to vs Google Tasks
- Assistant.to vs YouCanBook.me
- Assistant.to vs Cron Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Harvest Forecast
- Assistant.to vs Resource Guru
- Assistant.to vs SavvyCal
- Assistant.to vs Skedda
- Assistant.to vs Timepage
- Assistant.to vs Woven
- Assistant.to vs Zoom
- Assistant.to vs Microsoft Teams
- Assistant.to vs Loom
- Assistant.to vs RingCentral Video
- Assistant.to vs Slack
- Assistant.to vs Telegram
- Assistant.to vs Webex by Cisco
- Assistant.to vs Chanty
- Assistant.to vs Chatwork
- Assistant.to vs Flock
- Assistant.to vs Google Chat
- Assistant.to vs Lark
- Assistant.to vs Mattermost
- Assistant.to vs Quo
- Assistant.to vs Rocket.Chat
- Assistant.to vs Signal
- Assistant.to vs TeamViewer
- Assistant.to vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs Google Calendar
- Grasshopper vs Apple Calendar
- Grasshopper vs Fantastical
- Grasshopper vs Clockify
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft To Do
- Grasshopper vs OmniFocus
- Grasshopper vs Amie
- Grasshopper vs Outlook Calendar
- Grasshopper vs Float
- Grasshopper vs Google Tasks
- Grasshopper vs YouCanBook.me
- Grasshopper vs Cron Calendar
- Grasshopper vs Harvest Forecast
- Grasshopper vs Resource Guru
- Grasshopper vs SavvyCal
- Grasshopper vs Skedda
- Grasshopper vs Timepage
- Grasshopper vs Woven
- Grasshopper vs Zoom
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
- Grasshopper vs Loom
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Slack
- Grasshopper vs Telegram
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs Signal
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline


