Software · head to head
Achievers vs Lark
The short version
- Only Lark has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Achievers pricing is not published and requires a demo; Lark lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
- They diverge on capability: Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Lark covers Team messaging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Achievers and Lark actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Achievers
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points-based rewards
- Marketplace rewards
- Pulse surveys
- Employee connections
- Analytics dashboard
- Values alignment
Only in Lark
- Team messaging
- Video conferencing
- Collaborative docs
- Cloud storage
- Calendar
- Jira
- GitHub
- Salesforce
Both cover
- ISO27001
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Achievers
- Employee recognitionnot Lark
- Rewards programnot Lark
- Engagement measurementnot Lark
- Culture buildingnot Lark
- Retention improvementnot Lark
Lark
- Team communicationnot Achievers
- Document collaborationnot Achievers
- Project managementnot Achievers
- Company intranetnot Achievers
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Achievers
- Pricing is not published and requires a demo
- Aimed at mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than small teams
- Sold as separate named modules, Recognize, Reward and Celebrate, so a full programme means more than one line on the quote
Lark
- Lark's own pricing page description states it offers a free starter pack, a Pro plan, and an Enterprise plan, and directs buyers to Contact us rather than publishing Pro/Enterprise figures on the rendered page.
Pricing, plan by plan
Achievers
On request- Recognize$undefined/month
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points & rewards
- Listen$undefined/month
- Engagement surveys
- Pulse surveys
- Analytics
- Connect$undefined/month
- Employee connections
- Interest groups
- Events
Lark
Free- StarterFree
- Up to 50 users
- 100GB storage
- Unlimited messaging
- Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users
- 1TB storage per user
- 24-hour meetings
- Enterprise$20/month
- SSO/SAML
- eDiscovery
- Custom retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Achievers if
- You need peer-to-peer recognition.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want manager recognition.
Choose Lark if
- You need team messaging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- You also want video conferencing.
Questions people ask
- Is Achievers or Lark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Achievers starts at On request and Lark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Achievers or Lark?
- Lark has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Achievers and Free for Lark.
- Does Achievers or Lark run on more platforms?
- Achievers runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Lark runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Linux, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Lark for free?
- Yes. Lark has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Achievers starts at On request.
- What is Achievers best used for?
- Achievers is most often used for employee recognition, rewards program, engagement measurement, culture building. Of those, employee recognition and rewards program are not what Lark is typically brought in for.
- What can Achievers do that Lark cannot?
- Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Manager recognition, Points-based rewards, Marketplace rewards. Lark covers Team messaging, Video conferencing, Collaborative docs, Cloud storage. Both handle ISO27001.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Achievers vs BambooHR
- Achievers vs Workday
- Achievers vs Culture Amp
- Achievers vs Freshteam
- Achievers vs TINYpulse
- Achievers vs Zoho People
- Achievers vs 15Five
- Achievers vs Bonusly
- Achievers vs CharlieHR
- Achievers vs Kudos
- Achievers vs Lattice
- Achievers vs Personio
- Achievers vs Breathe HR
- Achievers vs Darwinbox
- Achievers vs Employment Hero
- Achievers vs greytHR
- Achievers vs HiBob
- Achievers vs Homebase
- Achievers vs Zoom
- Achievers vs Microsoft Teams
- Achievers vs Loom
- Achievers vs RingCentral Video
- Achievers vs Slack
- Achievers vs Telegram
- Achievers vs Webex by Cisco
- Achievers vs Chanty
- Achievers vs Chatwork
- Achievers vs Flock
- Achievers vs Google Chat
- Achievers vs Grasshopper
- Achievers vs Mattermost
- Achievers vs Quo
- Achievers vs Rocket.Chat
- Achievers vs Signal
- Achievers vs TeamViewer
- Achievers vs Textline
- Lark vs BambooHR
- Lark vs Workday
- Lark vs Culture Amp
- Lark vs Freshteam
- Lark vs TINYpulse
- Lark vs Zoho People
- Lark vs 15Five
- Lark vs Bonusly
- Lark vs CharlieHR
- Lark vs Kudos
- Lark vs Lattice
- Lark vs Personio
- Lark vs Breathe HR
- Lark vs Darwinbox
- Lark vs Employment Hero
- Lark vs greytHR
- Lark vs HiBob
- Lark vs Homebase
- Lark vs Zoom
- Lark vs Microsoft Teams
- Lark vs Loom
- Lark vs RingCentral Video
- Lark vs Slack
- Lark vs Telegram
- Lark vs Webex by Cisco
- Lark vs Chanty
- Lark vs Chatwork
- Lark vs Flock
- Lark vs Google Chat
- Lark vs Grasshopper
- Lark vs Mattermost
- Lark vs Quo
- Lark vs Rocket.Chat
- Lark vs Signal
- Lark vs TeamViewer
- Lark vs Textline


