Softwr

Software · head to head

deck.gl vs Maptek I-Site

deck.gl logo

deck.gl

Software

WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Maptek I-Site logo

Maptek I-Site

Software

3D laser scanning and point cloud processing

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.; Maptek I-Site the workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
  • They diverge on capability: deck.gl covers Core Functionality, Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which deck.gl and Maptek I-Site actually diverge.

Attributes where deck.gl and Maptek I-Site differ
Attributedeck.glMaptek I-Site
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
PlatformsWebWindows
FoundedUnknown1981

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in deck.gl

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

Only in Maptek I-Site

  • Point cloud processing
  • 3D model creation
  • Pit wall monitoring
  • Stockpile measurement
  • Change detection
  • Vulcan
  • CAD systems
  • GIS platforms

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

deck.gl

  • GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Maptek I-Site
  • Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Maptek I-Site
  • Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Maptek I-Site
  • High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Maptek I-Site
  • Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Maptek I-Site

Maptek I-Site

  • Laser scanning surveys of open pit and underground mine workingsnot deck.gl
  • Geotechnical monitoring of pit walls and slopesnot deck.gl
  • Volume and stockpile measurement from point cloud datanot deck.gl

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

deck.gl

  • deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.

Maptek I-Site

  • The workflow depends on buying Maptek laser scanner hardware, sold as the NS4, XR3, XR3-D and UR3 models
  • Scanner range is fixed per model, at 1,000 m for the NS4, 2,800 m for the XR3, 1,200 m for the XR3-D and 3,500 m for the UR3, so range upgrades mean buying different hardware
  • No price, licence type or subscription term is published; the page offers only a spec sheet request and a contact form

Pricing, plan by plan

deck.gl

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.

Maptek I-Site

On request
  • I-Site Studio$11000/year
    • Point cloud processing
    • 3D modeling
    • Pit wall analysis

Which should you pick?

Choose deck.gl if

  • You need core functionality.
  • You also want user interface.
deck.gl review

Choose Maptek I-Site if

  • You need point cloud processing.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want 3d model creation.
Maptek I-Site review

Questions people ask

Is deck.gl or Maptek I-Site better?
Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, deck.gl or Maptek I-Site?
deck.gl starts at On request and Maptek I-Site at On request.
Does deck.gl or Maptek I-Site run on more platforms?
deck.gl runs on Web. Maptek I-Site runs on Windows.
What is deck.gl best used for?
deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what Maptek I-Site is typically brought in for.
What can deck.gl do that Maptek I-Site cannot?
deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface. Maptek I-Site covers Point cloud processing, 3D model creation, Pit wall monitoring, Stockpile measurement.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on deck.gl

More on Maptek I-Site

Keep looking

Other head to heads