Softwr

Software · head to head

Razorpay vs Strapi

R

Razorpay

Software

Accept, process and disburse payments with India's leading payments platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Strapi logo

Strapi

Software

Headless CMS with REST and GraphQL APIs

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Strapi has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Razorpay international card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee; Strapi cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Razorpay and Strapi actually diverge.

Attributes where Razorpay and Strapi differ
AttributeRazorpayStrapi
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modeltransactionopen-source
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebNode.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Razorpay

Nothing recorded that Strapi does not also cover.

Only in Strapi

  • REST API
  • GraphQL API
  • Content management
  • PostgreSQL
  • MySQL
  • MongoDB
  • AWS
  • Webhooks

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Razorpay

No use cases recorded yet. See the Razorpay review.

Strapi

  • Running a self hosted headless CMS with a REST or GraphQL APInot Razorpay
  • Giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content modelnot Razorpay

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Razorpay

  • International card payments cost up to 3% per transaction versus 2% domestically, per razorpay.com/pricing (Aug 2026), and an 18% GST is added on top of the platform fee
  • Instant refunds cost between Rs. 7.99 and Rs. 14.99 per refund on top of the transaction fee, per Razorpay's own pricing page; standard refunds are free but instant ones are not

Strapi

  • Cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
  • Starter at $35 a month allows 100,000 API requests, and overage is $1.50 per 25,000
  • Extra bandwidth is $30 per 100 GB and extra asset storage $0.60 per GB
  • Backups start at the Pro plan, weekly, and only become daily at Business
  • An uptime SLA is Business only, at $450 a month per project
  • Additional environments cost $60 a month on Pro and $300 a month on Business

Pricing, plan by plan

Razorpay

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Razorpay review.

Strapi

Free
  • CommunityFree
    • Self-hosted Strapi
    • Community support
  • Pro$99/monthly
    • Cloud hosting
    • Advanced features
    • Priority support
  • Business$undefined/monthly
    • Enterprise features
    • Custom SLA
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Razorpay if

Nothing in the data separates Razorpay from Strapi on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose Strapi if

  • You need rest api.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
  • You also want graphql api.

Questions people ask

Is Razorpay or Strapi better?
Neither clearly leads. Razorpay starts at On request and Strapi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Razorpay or Strapi?
Strapi has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Razorpay and Free for Strapi.
Does Razorpay or Strapi run on more platforms?
Razorpay runs on Web. Strapi runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
Can I use Strapi for free?
Yes. Strapi has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Razorpay starts at On request.
What can Razorpay do that Strapi cannot?
Strapi covers REST API, GraphQL API, Content management, PostgreSQL.

Related pages

Other head to heads