Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Qwilr vs Reveal

Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Sales Enablement

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
R

Reveal

Affiliate Marketing

Partner revenue intelligence platform

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Reveal has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • They diverge on capability: Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Reveal covers Account mapping.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Qwilr and Reveal actually diverge.

Attributes where Qwilr and Reveal differ
AttributeQwilrReveal
Starting price$35/monthFree
Free tierNoYes
CategorySales EnablementAffiliate Marketing
Founded20142019

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Stripe

Only in Reveal

  • Account mapping
  • Partner matching
  • Secure data sharing
  • Opportunity identification
  • Pipeline analytics
  • Microsoft Teams

Both cover

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Slack
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Reveal

Reveal

  • affiliate marketing managementnot Qwilr
  • Workflow automationnot Qwilr
  • Reportingnot Qwilr

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Reveal

Nothing recorded yet. See the Reveal review.

Pricing, plan by plan

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Business$35/month
    • Unlimited documents
    • Templates
    • E-signatures
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • Integrations

Reveal

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Unlimited connections
    • Account mapping
    • Basic features

Which should you pick?

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.
Qwilr review

Choose Reveal if

  • You need account mapping.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want partner matching.
Reveal review

Questions people ask

Is Qwilr or Reveal better?
Neither clearly leads. Qwilr starts at $35/month and Reveal at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Qwilr or Reveal?
Reveal has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $35/month for Qwilr and Free for Reveal.
Does Qwilr or Reveal run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Reveal for free?
Yes. Reveal has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qwilr starts at $35/month.
What is Qwilr best used for?
Qwilr is most often used for sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billing. Of those, sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billing is not what Reveal is typically brought in for.
What can Qwilr do that Reveal cannot?
Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Reveal covers Account mapping, Partner matching, Secure data sharing, Opportunity identification. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Web support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Qwilr

More on Reveal

Keep looking

Other head to heads