Remote Work · head to head
Make vs n8n
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Make free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month; n8n starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- They diverge on capability: Make covers Visual workflow builder, n8n covers Workflow automation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Make and n8n actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Make
- Visual workflow builder
- API connectors
- Conditional logic
- Data transformation
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
- Custom APIs
- REST endpoints
Only in n8n
- Workflow automation
- Visual editor
- Conditional execution
- Looping
- REST API
- 400+ integrations
- HTTP requests
- Custom nodes
Both cover
- Webhooks
- Error handling
- Scheduling
- Webhooks
- GDPR compliant
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Make
- Automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applicationsnot n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation without extensive codingnot n8n
- Enterprise automation with GDPR, SOC 2 Type II compliancenot n8n
- Rapid deployment of automations from concept to livenot n8n
n8n
- Building AI agents and workflow automation for technical teamsnot Make
- Visual workflow design with capability to write custom JavaScript or Python codenot Make
- Enterprise deployments with self-hosted or cloud optionsnot Make
- Integrating 500+ pre-built applications with custom API connectionsnot Make
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Make
- Free tier limited to 1,000 credits per month
- Free tier restricted to 2 active scenarios maximum
- Free tier enforces 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Credit-based model means costs scale with usage volume, not just features
n8n
- Starter tier limited to 1 project and 5 concurrent executions
- Starter and Pro tiers restricted to Cloud hosting only, not self-hosted
- Business tier requires 6 months minimum commitment at €667/month
- SSO/SAML/LDAP authentication requires Business or Enterprise tier
- Dedicated support with SLA available only on Enterprise plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Make
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Make review.
n8n
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the n8n review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Make if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want api connectors.
Choose n8n if
- You need workflow automation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want visual editor.
Questions people ask
- Is Make or n8n better?
- Neither clearly leads. Make starts at Free and n8n at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Make or n8n?
- Make starts at Free and n8n at Free.
- Does Make or n8n run on more platforms?
- Make runs on Web. n8n runs on Web, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Make for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Make best used for?
- Make is most often used for automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications, building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding, enterprise automation with gdpr, soc 2 type ii compliance, rapid deployment of automations from concept to live. Of those, automating integrations between 3,000+ pre-built applications and building ai agents and workflow automation without extensive coding are not what n8n is typically brought in for.
- What can Make do that n8n cannot?
- Make covers Visual workflow builder, API connectors, Conditional logic, Data transformation. n8n covers Workflow automation, Visual editor, Conditional execution, Looping. Both handle Webhooks, Error handling, Scheduling, Webhooks.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Make vs HubSpot CRM
- Make vs Fireflies.ai
- Make vs Gather
- Make vs IFTTT
- Make vs Otter.ai
- Make vs tl;dv
- Make vs Vidyard
- Make vs ConnectWise
- Make vs Grain
- Make vs Kaseya VSA
- Make vs Krisp
- Make vs Mmhmm
- Make vs Monday Sales CRM
- Make vs Mural
- Make vs N-able N-central
- Make vs Pop
- Make vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Make vs Splashtop
- Make vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Make vs Zapier
- Make vs MuleSoft
- Make vs Parabola
- Make vs Zapier Plus
- Make vs Jitterbit
- Make vs mParticle
- Make vs Paragon
- Make vs RudderStack
- Make vs Workato
- Make vs Airbyte
- Make vs Automate.io
- Make vs Boomi
- Make vs Browser Use
- Make vs Browserbase
- Make vs Celigo
- Make vs Census
- Make vs CrewAI
- n8n vs HubSpot CRM
- n8n vs Fireflies.ai
- n8n vs Gather
- n8n vs IFTTT
- n8n vs Otter.ai
- n8n vs tl;dv
- n8n vs Vidyard
- n8n vs ConnectWise
- n8n vs Grain
- n8n vs Kaseya VSA
- n8n vs Krisp
- n8n vs Mmhmm
- n8n vs Monday Sales CRM
- n8n vs Mural
- n8n vs N-able N-central
- n8n vs Pop
- n8n vs Slack Workflow Builder
- n8n vs Splashtop
- n8n vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n vs Zapier
- n8n vs MuleSoft
- n8n vs Parabola
- n8n vs Zapier Plus
- n8n vs Jitterbit
- n8n vs mParticle
- n8n vs Paragon
- n8n vs RudderStack
- n8n vs Workato
- n8n vs Airbyte
- n8n vs Automate.io
- n8n vs Boomi
- n8n vs Browser Use
- n8n vs Browserbase
- n8n vs Celigo
- n8n vs Census
- n8n vs CrewAI


