Software · head to head
Heroku vs npm
The short version
- Only npm has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; npm private packages require a paid user or organization account; the free registry publishes publicly only
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, npm covers Package installation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and npm actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in npm
- Package installation
- Dependency management
- Version management
- Script running
- Package publishing
- Security auditing
- Package discovery
- CLI interface
Both cover
- GitHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot npm
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot npm
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot npm
npm
- Package managementnot Heroku
- Dependency installationnot Heroku
- Project scaffoldingnot Heroku
- Build automationnot Heroku
- Package publishingnot Heroku
- Version controlnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
npm
- Private packages require a paid user or organization account; the free registry publishes publicly only
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
npm
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited public packages
- Package discovery
- npm CLI
- Pro$7/month
- Unlimited private packages
- Package analytics
- Support
- Teams$7/month
- Team management
- Organization packages
- Audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose npm if
- You need package installation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- You also want dependency management.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or npm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and npm at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or npm?
- npm has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for npm.
- Does Heroku or npm run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. npm runs on Windows, Macos, Linux.
- Can I use npm for free?
- Yes. npm has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what npm is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that npm cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. npm covers Package installation, Dependency management, Version management, Script running. Both handle GitHub.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Django
- Heroku vs MySQL
- Heroku vs Next.js
- Heroku vs Flask
- Heroku vs Laravel
- Heroku vs React
- Heroku vs Vue.js
- Heroku vs Nginx
- Heroku vs Node.js
- Heroku vs v0 by Vercel
- Heroku vs Apache HTTP Server
- Heroku vs Astro
- Heroku vs Bolt.new
- Heroku vs Carrd
- Heroku vs .NET
- Heroku vs Express.js
- Heroku vs FastAPI
- Heroku vs NestJS
- npm vs Grafana Cloud
- npm vs Neon
- npm vs DigitalOcean
- npm vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- npm vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- npm vs Deno Deploy
- npm vs Hetzner Cloud
- npm vs Linode
- npm vs Packer
- npm vs Pulumi
- npm vs Render
- npm vs Upstash
- npm vs Vagrant
- npm vs Vultr
- npm vs Akamai
- npm vs Alibaba Cloud
- npm vs Chef
- npm vs Contabo
- npm vs Django
- npm vs MySQL
- npm vs Next.js
- npm vs Flask
- npm vs Laravel
- npm vs React
- npm vs Vue.js
- npm vs Nginx
- npm vs Node.js
- npm vs v0 by Vercel
- npm vs Apache HTTP Server
- npm vs Astro
- npm vs Bolt.new
- npm vs Carrd
- npm vs .NET
- npm vs Express.js
- npm vs FastAPI
- npm vs NestJS


