Software · head to head
Heroku vs NestJS
N
NestJS
Software
A progressive Node.js framework for efficient, reliable and scalable server-side apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only NestJS has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; NestJS licensed under the MIT License per nestjs.com; the core framework has no paid tier, but the Enterprise support offering (architectural reviews, LTS, upgrade assistance) is sold by direct contact with no published rate
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and NestJS actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in NestJS
Nothing recorded that Heroku does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot NestJS
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot NestJS
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot NestJS
NestJS
No use cases recorded yet. See the NestJS review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
NestJS
- Licensed under the MIT License per nestjs.com; the core framework has no paid tier, but the Enterprise support offering (architectural reviews, LTS, upgrade assistance) is sold by direct contact with no published rate
- Built specifically on TypeScript and Node.js, per nestjs.com's own description, so it requires that runtime and cannot be adopted independently of the Node.js ecosystem
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
NestJS
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the NestJS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or NestJS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and NestJS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or NestJS?
- NestJS has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for NestJS.
- Does Heroku or NestJS run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. NestJS runs on Web.
- Can I use NestJS for free?
- Yes. NestJS has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what NestJS is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that NestJS cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Django
- Heroku vs MySQL
- Heroku vs Next.js
- Heroku vs Flask
- Heroku vs Laravel
- Heroku vs npm
- Heroku vs React
- Heroku vs Vue.js
- Heroku vs Nginx
- Heroku vs Node.js
- Heroku vs v0 by Vercel
- Heroku vs Apache HTTP Server
- Heroku vs Astro
- Heroku vs Bolt.new
- Heroku vs Carrd
- Heroku vs .NET
- Heroku vs Express.js
- Heroku vs FastAPI
- NestJS vs Grafana Cloud
- NestJS vs Neon
- NestJS vs DigitalOcean
- NestJS vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- NestJS vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- NestJS vs Deno Deploy
- NestJS vs Hetzner Cloud
- NestJS vs Linode
- NestJS vs Packer
- NestJS vs Pulumi
- NestJS vs Render
- NestJS vs Upstash
- NestJS vs Vagrant
- NestJS vs Vultr
- NestJS vs Akamai
- NestJS vs Alibaba Cloud
- NestJS vs Chef
- NestJS vs Contabo
- NestJS vs Django
- NestJS vs MySQL
- NestJS vs Next.js
- NestJS vs Flask
- NestJS vs Laravel
- NestJS vs npm
- NestJS vs React
- NestJS vs Vue.js
- NestJS vs Nginx
- NestJS vs Node.js
- NestJS vs v0 by Vercel
- NestJS vs Apache HTTP Server
- NestJS vs Astro
- NestJS vs Bolt.new
- NestJS vs Carrd
- NestJS vs .NET
- NestJS vs Express.js
- NestJS vs FastAPI