Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Heroku vs Laravel
The short version
- Only Laravel has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heroku there is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month; Laravel performance overhead from abstractions, middleware pipeline, and multiple layers can slow applications compared to minimal frameworks
- They diverge on capability: Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Laravel covers Eloquent ORM.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heroku and Laravel actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heroku
- Git-based deployment
- Buildpacks
- Dynos (containers)
- Add-ons marketplace
- Postgres database
- Environment variables
- Logging
- API
Only in Laravel
- Eloquent ORM
- Artisan CLI
- Blade templating
- Middleware
- Authentication
- Caching
- Queue system
- Event broadcasting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heroku
- Deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administrationnot Laravel
- Running managed Postgres, Redis and Kafka as attached data servicesnot Laravel
- Isolated production environments in a Private Space for regulated workloadsnot Laravel
Laravel
- Web application developmentnot Heroku
- API developmentnot Heroku
- E-commerce platformsnot Heroku
- Content managementnot Heroku
- Enterprise applicationsnot Heroku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heroku
- There is no free dyno tier; the cheapest Eco dyno is $5 per month
- Eco dynos sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, are restricted to personal accounts and allow only 2 process types
- Free SSL and 10 process types start at the Basic dyno at $7 per month
- Private and Shield dyno types require a Private Space, which is billed on top of the dynos
- Private Space dynos start at $250 per month for Private-M and $500 per month for Private-L
- Dyno prices are per dyno per month, so an app with several process types multiplies the bill
Laravel
- Performance overhead from abstractions, middleware pipeline, and multiple layers can slow applications compared to minimal frameworks
- Dependency management is complex with many interdependent packages requiring careful version coordination
Pricing, plan by plan
Heroku
$7/month- Hobby$7/month
- 512MB RAM
- Shared CPU
- 1 web dyno
- Standard$50/month
- 512MB RAM
- Dedicated CPU
- Automatic scaling
Laravel
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full framework
- Artisan CLI
- Eloquent ORM
- Laravel Forge$12/month
- Server management
- Deployment automation
- SSL certificates
- Laravel Vapor$39/month
- Serverless deployment
- Auto-scaling
- AWS integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Heroku if
- You need git-based deployment.
- You work on Web, Api, Workers.
- You also want buildpacks.
Choose Laravel if
- You need eloquent orm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want artisan cli.
Questions people ask
- Is Heroku or Laravel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heroku starts at $7/month and Laravel at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heroku or Laravel?
- Laravel has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Heroku and Free for Laravel.
- Does Heroku or Laravel run on more platforms?
- Heroku runs on Web, Api, Workers. Laravel runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Laravel for free?
- Yes. Laravel has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Heroku starts at $7/month.
- What is Heroku best used for?
- Heroku is most often used for deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration, running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services, isolated production environments in a private space for regulated workloads. Of those, deploying and scaling web applications with git push and no server administration and running managed postgres, redis and kafka as attached data services are not what Laravel is typically brought in for.
- What can Heroku do that Laravel cannot?
- Heroku covers Git-based deployment, Buildpacks, Dynos (containers), Add-ons marketplace. Laravel covers Eloquent ORM, Artisan CLI, Blade templating, Middleware.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Laravel: Is Laravel free and open source?
Yes, Laravel is completely free and open source under the MIT License. You can use, modify, and distribute it without restrictions.
SourceLaravel: What are the key features Laravel provides?
Laravel includes an ORM (Eloquent), database migrations, authentication, authorization, caching, queues, email, testing, and deployment tools. It supports multiple databases and provides starter kits for full-stack and API development.
SourceLaravel: Can I deploy Laravel on any server?
Yes, Laravel can be deployed on any PHP server. You can use shared hosting, VPS, or managed platforms like Laravel Cloud, which starts at $5/month with auto-scaling and git-like branching.
SourceLaravel: Does Laravel have testing and local development tools?
Yes, Laravel includes Dusk for browser testing, PHPUnit for unit tests, and Herd (free for basic use) for local development environments with built-in PHP, Composer, and Nginx support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Heroku vs Grafana Cloud
- Heroku vs Neon
- Heroku vs DigitalOcean
- Heroku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Heroku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Heroku vs Deno Deploy
- Heroku vs Hetzner Cloud
- Heroku vs Linode
- Heroku vs Packer
- Heroku vs Pulumi
- Heroku vs Render
- Heroku vs Upstash
- Heroku vs Vagrant
- Heroku vs Vultr
- Heroku vs Akamai
- Heroku vs Alibaba Cloud
- Heroku vs Chef
- Heroku vs Contabo
- Heroku vs Django
- Heroku vs MySQL
- Heroku vs Next.js
- Heroku vs Flask
- Heroku vs npm
- Heroku vs React
- Heroku vs Vue.js
- Heroku vs Nginx
- Heroku vs Node.js
- Heroku vs v0 by Vercel
- Heroku vs Apache HTTP Server
- Heroku vs Astro
- Heroku vs Bolt.new
- Heroku vs Carrd
- Heroku vs .NET
- Heroku vs Express.js
- Heroku vs FastAPI
- Heroku vs NestJS
- Laravel vs Grafana Cloud
- Laravel vs Neon
- Laravel vs DigitalOcean
- Laravel vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Laravel vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Laravel vs Deno Deploy
- Laravel vs Hetzner Cloud
- Laravel vs Linode
- Laravel vs Packer
- Laravel vs Pulumi
- Laravel vs Render
- Laravel vs Upstash
- Laravel vs Vagrant
- Laravel vs Vultr
- Laravel vs Akamai
- Laravel vs Alibaba Cloud
- Laravel vs Chef
- Laravel vs Contabo
- Laravel vs Django
- Laravel vs MySQL
- Laravel vs Next.js
- Laravel vs Flask
- Laravel vs npm
- Laravel vs React
- Laravel vs Vue.js
- Laravel vs Nginx
- Laravel vs Node.js
- Laravel vs v0 by Vercel
- Laravel vs Apache HTTP Server
- Laravel vs Astro
- Laravel vs Bolt.new
- Laravel vs Carrd
- Laravel vs .NET
- Laravel vs Express.js
- Laravel vs FastAPI
- Laravel vs NestJS


